Прежде чем говорить о симфонии, хорошо бы научиться различать два цвета - белое и черное. Однако в России именно с этим вечные сложности. Можно в чужом Конгрессе поливать собственную страну помоями и прозываться здесь по-домашнему Андреем, а не ублюдком и полным ничтожеством. При встрече не стыдно будет еще и вместе выпить. Вот в чем состоит для меня загадка современной русской души.  Видимо, она для меня слишком сложна.
http://aillarionov.livejournal.com/71268.html
http://m-yu-sokolov.livejournal.com/716867.html?style=mine#comments
 
http://www.internationalrelations.house.gov/111/ill022509.pdf

Policy of the proclaimed “cooperation”, “movement from competition to
collaboration”, “improvement of relations” with the current political regime in Russia has
very clear consequences. Such type of behavior on the part of the US administration can
not be called even a retreat. It is not even an appeasement policy that is so well known to
all of us by another Munch decision in 1938. It is a surrender. It is a full, absolute and
unconditional surrender to the regime of the secret police officers, chekists and Mafiosi bandits
in today’s Russia. It is a surrender of the hopes and efforts of the Russian
democrats as well as peoples of the post-Soviet states who dreamed to get out of the
system that controlled and tortured them for almost a century – back to the Chekists’
power. But it is even more. It is a clear manifestation to all democratic and liberal forces
in Russia and in other post-Soviet states that on all internal and external issues of their
struggle against forces of the past the United States now abandons them and takes the
position of their deadly adversaries and enemies. And therefore it is an open invitation for
new adventures of the Russian Chekists’ regime in the post-Soviet space and at some
points beyond it.
The very term for such type of policy has not been chosen by me, it is borrowed
from the title of this hearing, namely, collaboration. Therefore the term chosen for the
agents of the US administration’s policy in the coming era is “collaborationists”.
Collaboration between two governments today could be only on the Russian regime’s terms and for
fulfillment of the Russian government’s goals. From the European history
of the XX century we know what means if a revisionist power has a clear-cut goal to
restore influence and control over its neighbors while other powers chose not to defend
victims of the attacks, but instead try to collaborate with an aggressor.
We know the consequences of the collaborationist policy – those who retreat and
surrender will get not peace, but war, war with unpredictable and nasty results. It might
be also not a one war.