|
|
Пишет nancygold (![[info]](http://lj.rossia.org/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} nancygold)@ 2024-06-22 11:17:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Настроение: |  amused |
Apparently 48-bit PRNGs were popular at one point
One even came with SVr1 Unix in 1983, called rand48 (drand48.s), which was state of art at the time:
https://sci-hub.ru/10.1002/j.1538-7
Yet the Unix one produced entire 32-bit number, while the PRNG I encountered uses all 48 bits to generate a single byte.
Добавить комментарий:
