surely, you are not evil, you are just ugly and stupid, ZadkOV

that's more than a crime - that's a mistake of nature
you are the mistake of nature, ZadkOV

"пизды" врастопырку

Nancy, people in your condition simply don't have working certain parts of the brain responsible for understanding such complex intersocial concepts. It's like not having sight or sense of smell. You just can't. So don't bust your arse trying to understand (and moreover "explain") something that is basically inaccessible to you from the world of neurotypical people.
You're just an aging balding russian crossdresser with incurable psychiatric defects, genetic waste. Nobody gives a shit whether you're evil or not.

double scotch to this anon!

you'd better be evil

искал "evil tranny", нашел Садкову от музыки:

Aivet - she/her

Слушать невозможно, но есть след lyrics:

"You call me evil tranny faggot shut the fuck up stupid maggot
Follow me for one more block, [?]
Bet you wanna fuck me ['til/to?] your boring cishet [white?]
Just like every other stupid chaser that I've ever met
That's [?] to hit me up on Grindr, tell your wife [you ate the fork at work?]
Want to fuck a girl like me but you cannot admit it
Fuck with homophobic insecurity know what that means
Your pussy bitches [closet?] taste like you could ever get it"

"I ain't gonna say this shit ain't with me
But all you ugly boys don't want to see my dicky
She ain't shootin yet but test me
My Glock, she/her, long dick and two titties"

you are not evil, you are retard and russian agent.

Nah nah nah. Nobody said you are evil. I just noted that you espouse the ideology of the characters designated as "evil" by the mainstream western culture (proclaim the primacy of selfishness, adoration of mass murderers and mass murder, consider it a performance act to be enjoyed, same with torture of small animals, constant dehumanization of this and that group, and so on and so forth, you know this list is extremely long), so watching them constantly lose must be very tiring.

"I just like people solve complex problems" is a cope and a deflection.

And you literally are evil according to the prevalent moral standards in literally any human society. But you brought up "evil" first -- even the authors avoid this word and focus on the practical motivations for the need of defeating the enemy.

>I'm not evil, because there is no evil.

Literal main antagonist speak.

>relativism

Relativism is for comparing human cultures, social norms etc, not juxtaposing an ideology of lonely psychopaths vs the rest of the world. A tool to reveal non-universality and hypocrisy. That has nothing to do with you because your preferences are universally condemned.

>Evil is always relative to some agent or a group of agents.

In your case, with your moral standards and preferences, it's you against the entire humanity, with maybe literal tens of other freaks being able to find something in common with you(with whom you are not in any kind of relationship).

>And civilized people call both of these aboriginal tribes evil.

Show me such "civilized people" beside yourself. Is it some imageboard goblins? Actual civilized people are civilized for a reason (they are for the restriction of animal urges which are problematic for the functioning of large societies), and such unadulterated wishing of ill is highly frowned upon, unless directly involved in the conflict.

In the previous post you defined such imaginary people as "smart", and refused to provide examples also.

>In Bible it is definitely not an evil to do a genocide.

People developed a higher understanding of morality since the bronze age, and these parts of the bible are sweeped under the rug, hidden, ignored. And it's about doing it as a group anyway, for the benefit of the group. You aren't a group.

>generalize

generalization has nothing to do with it. By their very nature moral standards are general.

>Bible condones genocide.

"People developed a higher understanding of morality since the bronze age, and these parts of the bible are sweeped under the rug, hidden, ignored. And it's about doing it as a group anyway, for the benefit of the group. You aren't a group."

>Jews perform the genocide of the Palestinian subhumans.

Shyly, plausibly deniably, their stated goal is deHamasization. And they are pretty widely condemned by basically anyone who isn't in power in the west (due to the established western guilt towards jews, their vast monetary invluence on politics, geopolitical opposition to Iran), and isn't an American "Friends of Israel" Evangelicals

There wouldn't be such articles in the Wikipedia otherwise https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide#International_complicity

>Our Dutch Afrikaners dreamed of genociding niggers.

Oh yes. In the 19th century.

>In the 19th century.

Maybe you meant during Apartheid, but such dreams after WW2 were an impossibility due to the prevailing internationally enforced moral standards. So I doubt they were dreamed. They dreamed of better segregation at best.

>can cash his Jewish billion USD

The man was personally tutored by lead Jewish mathematicians when he dropped out of MGU, giving him a needed advantage on the path towards Harvard (or he dropped out because he was tutored, don't remember exactly) He is/was smart, but we won't know whether his ethnicity played a role here. He personally said that Jews have a preference for Jews.

>lawyer with all these rape accusations.

There won't be any lawyer needed. It's internal investigation in a Brazilian institution. The country is a semi-failed state. There will be nothing. More so because the accusations are inane.

...

And you diverted the discussion -- Jews aren't officially or openly genociding anyone. They fight Hamas. Genocide is is a leftist accusation. It means you are indeed a moral outsider.

You are deflecting and deflecting. Whether there is a Jewish privilege isn't even important to the discussion at hand.

>Russians ain't lead at anything.

At the amount of foreign(ish) land annexed and controlled through war after the World War II.

I said "after the World War II", not "as the result of it". I was talking about this war.

>the German achievement.

Didn't know Peter the Great was German. And British Empire, and most European empires were also German achievements, because all the monarchs were basically of the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha dynasty or highly related to them.

>It included the work of German, Jewish and American engineers.

The building of the American empire included the work of German, Jewish, Russian engineers, and the work of many individuals or many other national and ethnic origins. So what?

>Russians are inborn serfs.

Ah yes, you feel very comfortable in this genre. It's your safe space.

Let's suppose that's true (It isn't, and the same statement could be made about the west too, to a large extent). So? Changes nothing.

And "Everything of value" in out of your mouth can't be taken seriously -- you literally defined it that way, i.e. it's independent of any evidence, nothing of value outside of jewish make can be found, per definition.

Also most jews have left now, but no total collapse could be observed, and those that remained are literally Russians, like these Soviet Jews who were literally also Russians, in the English language (where you need to add the "ethnic" for the expression to denote ethnicity and not nationality, which you didn't do), where Russian meant Soviet.

I.e. nobody with something to lose today even attempts to openly state that they want to do genocide. You can cite bronze age shit all you like, but, again, you aren't a group, и людей всячески пиздят за bronze age morality.

Verbitsky right now is spouting bronze age morality towards Palestinians and Russians, but he's as insane as you are. Always was, just much more high-functioning. He's one LLM-translation-of-his-blog-in-a-dedicated-website away from becoming a jobless persona non grata in the mathematical world.

>But I have nothing to lose, so I can say whatever I want lol.

You would say whatever you want regardless of whether you have or don't have something to lose. You don't have anything to lose precisely because you can't control your impulses. More high functioning psychopaths are actually not very obvious, they hide in plain sight.

>Russian

But why are you citing Russians to me? I'm not even Russian.

And focusing on group violence is basically a straw-man of my argument, because "mass murder as a performance act to enjoy", callousness, general lack of empathy, weekly calls to genocide of every group you have slight encounter with(or even no encounters), put your level of amorality/psychopathy found in your prose beyond what is normal for human group violence. Members of these groups are at least kind to their in-group members. You are kind to no one. Not even your family.

At least Israelis and Palestinians have an actual conflict with deep historical roots over the actual land. And your just hate all the humans you have some contact with, who are not directly beneficial to you right now. "I've been slightly slighted". Basically "not being beneficial to you is a crime worthy of being killed" is how your morality could be summarized.

You weren't kind to them before the transition either, and for minute slights too.

>being infantile.

Since when being infantile is a virtue and benefits the subject? So he was wishing you well? This piece of shit!

>They impeded my transitioning

Knowing you, "impeded my transitioning" could mean all kinds of insignificant bullshit. Also, transitioning in Russia would have been mightily stupid, so not a bad advice, and when you were in Ukraine already, they couldn't have impeded you in any way, other than with a word, and a negative reaction is actually normal in such cases -- lived their entire lives with you as a male.

>And why would anyone be kind to them?

You aren't kind to anyone. You are an asocial psycho capable only of short term transactional relationships, who's been rejected out of everywhere possible for being too fucked up.

Does your brother admit that he is gay?

Неважно, что про тебя говорят. Пересматривай это видео почаще
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGdRfwGJuWs

Btw, a new form of corporate virtue signalling:

https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/19/24223473/procreate-anti-generative-ai-pledge-digital-illustration-creatives

ты хуже мента

не сори, ты не лучше, два тупых совка

>People keep calling me "evil."

But those are not people. Always keep in mind that you have enemies, haters, bullies among Jews, Russians, Ukrainians on the Internet, kiwifarms and animal rights activists. They always write evil things through vpn and paying attention to their toxic comments is pointless. You overestimate the importance of their opinion. What may help:
Close the comments.
Delete toxic comments immediately.
Stop wasting time on ljr and imageboards.
Start reading smart useful books.

The principle "not being beneficial to you is a crime worthy of being killed" really works. The anons who satisfy your narcissistic needs (which are huge btw, considering by the regular self-posts on the imageboards) desire to live for a while, I guess.

s/desire/deserve/

Nice try Sadkov. Literally nobody in their right mind would imagine Sadkov as a kind individual. The man literally wakes up, and if it's not a technical post day, writes a hate post on how some group(s) or individual should violently perish, how they are not human worthy to live.

>toxic comments

That would mean to self-deletion of this entire blog.

Such as?

An amazing example. /s I remember you writing that you were so kind to her, that in the moment of need you refused social interaction with her, and she killed her self partly as the result of that. So the example you provided literally killed herself, and now there are no more living examples.

So you are literally incapable of being kind.

You've also written that she was struggling tolerating your "quirks".

It could also be said that she didn't live long enough for you to start hating her for one reason or another, which theoretically is the inevitability. So very convenient.

Religious people consider LGBT people evil, don't take it to heart. You're not a dollar to please everyone.

LUL. LGBT people consider Sadkov evil, which is well documented in this blog. Sadkov is also banned on several Reddit lgbt communities, and who knows where else.

Yes, yes. Feuding with any group or individual you encounter. Q. E. D.

>That is totally different from transsexual.

Not totally different. Transgenderism encompasses transsexualism and doesn't consider individuals who don't pursue medical transition as literal ugly subhuman filth, who should off themselves, which is what you espouse, and probably what got you banned. Transsexualism per se also doesn't have any antagonism towards transgenderism. The supposed conflict between the groups a product of your needle in haystack search after probably getting banned.


>authoritarian political ideology.

Denhumanizing entire groups is the most authoritarian political ideology there is.

>anyone insisting

anyone insisting for others. Nobody would hinder a self-paying individual who wants to medically transition. It's literally absurd to argue otherwise. But you tend to insist for others, by devaluation and dehumanization statements, like you always do.

>Even a bald bearded crossdresser and a diaper sissy grandpa are valid women.

So their standards not nazi enough for you? Not enough rejection, not enough gatekeeping?

>If taking estradiol and desiring to be beautiful makes me Nazi, then I'm Nazi.

You are again lying. It's about imposing your standards publicly, fucking the acceptance standards up for "bald bearded crossdressers".

If only you were able to shut up, out of politeness, understanding and empathy, there wouldn't be any issues. But it's literally impossible for you.

>I'm Nazi.

You are a nazi. We all know that. But it has nothing to do with transgenderism being authoritrian. You are who's authoritarian with your beauty standards in this case.

So their standards stand in the way of your financial parasitism. These pieces of shit removed the financial tranny burden from the normies!

But seriously what you say is literally isn't the case, and only a greater push toward forcing insurers to pay for medical transitioning can be observed. They call it "gender-affirming care" and in the US, the literal homeland of the LGBT and woke ideology. In the liberal states there are literally mandates for it. If the situation is different in the Netherlands then it has more to do with the Netherlands, rather than with the American led lgbt movement. Also you don't know Dutch, so you can't even knowingly tell what's the actual situation in the country. There is also the Sadkov factor, how you magically able to antagonize people around you so they aren't willing to help you.

https://www.npr.org/2021/10/14/1046140320/colorado-now-requires-gender-affirming-care-to-be-covered-by-private-health-insu

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/state-healthcare-plans-must-cover-transgender-related-care-federal-court-rules

>I got denied HRT in Netherlands

It requires more investigation before assigning the entirety or even part of the blame to the transgender movement, which is international. You don't know Dutch, so you don't even know what the laws are, the precedents etc etc. Such rejection could simply be illegal, a result of collusion between insurers and doctors, could be discrimination of immigrants(who came to drain resources here on their surgeries, let's be real), could be discrimination of you personally, which is highly likely, considering how abrasive you are.

There is a moral hazard -- if you pay for surgeries for LGBT asylum immigrants, do it more than someone else, than there will be financially burdensome influx of such immigrants. It isn't a simple issue.

>local LGBT faggots told me multiple times that dicks can be "feminine"

This doesn't necessarily have anything to do with denial of care for those who want this care. I see no contradiction with "dicks can be feminine" and "some want vaginas anyway".

"gender confirmation surgery is available for free on the NHS."

So, chose the wrong country.