Nah nah nah. Nobody said you are evil. I just noted that you espouse the ideology of the characters designated as "evil" by the mainstream western culture (proclaim the primacy of selfishness, adoration of mass murderers and mass murder, consider it a performance act to be enjoyed, same with torture of small animals, constant dehumanization of this and that group, and so on and so forth, you know this list is extremely long), so watching them constantly lose must be very tiring.

"I just like people solve complex problems" is a cope and a deflection.

And you literally are evil according to the prevalent moral standards in literally any human society. But you brought up "evil" first -- even the authors avoid this word and focus on the practical motivations for the need of defeating the enemy.

>I'm not evil, because there is no evil.

Literal main antagonist speak.

>relativism

Relativism is for comparing human cultures, social norms etc, not juxtaposing an ideology of lonely psychopaths vs the rest of the world. A tool to reveal non-universality and hypocrisy. That has nothing to do with you because your preferences are universally condemned.

>Evil is always relative to some agent or a group of agents.

In your case, with your moral standards and preferences, it's you against the entire humanity, with maybe literal tens of other freaks being able to find something in common with you(with whom you are not in any kind of relationship).

>And civilized people call both of these aboriginal tribes evil.

Show me such "civilized people" beside yourself. Is it some imageboard goblins? Actual civilized people are civilized for a reason (they are for the restriction of animal urges which are problematic for the functioning of large societies), and such unadulterated wishing of ill is highly frowned upon, unless directly involved in the conflict.

In the previous post you defined such imaginary people as "smart", and refused to provide examples also.

>In Bible it is definitely not an evil to do a genocide.

People developed a higher understanding of morality since the bronze age, and these parts of the bible are sweeped under the rug, hidden, ignored. And it's about doing it as a group anyway, for the benefit of the group. You aren't a group.

>generalize

generalization has nothing to do with it. By their very nature moral standards are general.