Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет nancygold ([info]nancygold)
@ 2024-08-19 21:00:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: amused
Музыка:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqREZRh7nso
Entry tags:transitioning

Why I am not "evil"

People keep calling me "evil."

But what does it mean to be "evil?" What makes one "evil?"

There were many definitions of evil across time and cultures.

Generally it boils down to "evil is something bad for our group."

Both Russians and Ukrainians call each other evil.

And civilized people call both of these aboriginal tribes evil.

In the overpopulated world the death of a billion could be good.

In fact, Bible promotes drowning all sinners.

In Bible it is definitely not an evil to do a genocide.

So we may conclude, that the notion of "evil" is not universal.

Evil is always relative to some agent or a group of agents.

Are mosquitoes evil? If you're a mammal, then yes.

But for a dragonfly it is a food source.

So speaking about some evil in abstract vacuum makes no sense.

Yet authors like Joanne Rofling have insect brain.

The relativism is too complex for them.

They generalize their notions of good and evil.

But such hasty generalizations fail.

So the stupid beings get confused.

I'm not evil, because there is no evil.

I'm not good, because there is no good.

I'm just what I am.

Everything else is a social construct.

I watch the movies to enjoy seeing the characters facing complex problems.

I don't care if the characters are "good" or "evil" in any of the notions.

I only care that the problems are complex and interesting enough.

Hope that explains it.


(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2024-08-20 14:25 (ссылка)
Such as?

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-08-20 14:33 (ссылка)
Antonina Babkina.
She was a wonderful person.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-08-20 14:39 (ссылка)
An amazing example. /s I remember you writing that you were so kind to her, that in the moment of need you refused social interaction with her, and she killed her self partly as the result of that. So the example you provided literally killed herself, and now there are no more living examples.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-08-20 15:13 (ссылка)
I have mental issues myself, so I'm in no position to support anyone.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-08-20 15:18 (ссылка)
So you are literally incapable of being kind.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-08-20 15:22 (ссылка)
Kindness is for rich people with enough resources to afford generousness.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2024-08-20 14:42 (ссылка)
You've also written that she was struggling tolerating your "quirks".

It could also be said that she didn't live long enough for you to start hating her for one reason or another, which theoretically is the inevitability. So very convenient.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Читать комментарии) -