Thursday, September 19th, 2024

Time	Event
2:13a	When people whine their salary is too low... Consider this: * You can sleep in your car or camp in a forest. That saves you on rent and gasoline. Rent a hotel once per month to shower (unless you do escort you don't need it more often). At worst cops will just ask you to move. * You can work as an undocumented. That saves you on taxes. And also qualifies you for stuff like foodstamps and other forms of welfare. * You can shoplift. Additional savings. And they can't fine you, since you don't have official income. * You can sell your ass as a gay escort, if you are top. Bottoms pay a fortune for a good top. Of course than need you to have a big dick, but still additional $100-300 per client. If you don't have big a dick, then get a fucking penis enlargement, instead of wasting money on a car. If you don't have access to running water, then just make enema with coca-cola, it is cheaper than condoms. You can save on condoms too, because HIV/AIDS is a bullshit meme like covid19 invented to scare people and sell more useless shit like preps. * Stop doing fucking kratom, retard! Even beer, weed and cigarettes are huge money wasters. Suddenly you also save money on healthcare. That easy! * Steal everything not bolted down and bolted down too! Here in NL it is super easy to loot bikes for parts, like bicycle seats, which you can easily sell at marktplaats.nl and facebook. In Russia you can loot usual cars. Nigga, you're rich, but you waste money on useless things like house rent and maintaining highly moral character. So sorry for ya. I think they should give me noble prize in economics or something, cuz I see what you dumbfucks don't. Current Mood: contemplative (48 Comments | Comment on this)
1:26p	Free Will Either Doesn't Exist or Poorly Defined You can disprove the possibility of free will with the basic school math done over a few axioms everyone can agree upon. Definitions: 1. Free will - "the ability to make choices independently, without being constrained by external forces or predetermined conditions." Most common definition, found on Wikipedia and generated by ChatGPT. Although one may argue on the border between internal and external forces. 2. Free entity - an entity which is supposed to possess free will. Our definition, since no common name for such entities exist. Axioms (call them common sense axioms): 1. Human being - an entity composed of physical matter, which is subject to all kinds of external physical forces. I think that is a reasonable assumption. 2. Multiple different free entities can exist at the same time. ChatGPT claims it is a commonly accepted fact. A few solipsists do insist that free will is unilateral and the world exists just for a single free entity, but such teleological view is uncommon. 3. Two human beings are considered different if they have different spatial configurations. For example, they are at different locations in some city. I.e. there is no multiverse. That is the most controversial axiom, but most people will agree that any two physical objects can never occupy the same space at the same time. To prove the existence of free will we need to prove that human beings form a subset of free entities. I.e. that "an entity composed of matter, which is subject to all kinds of external physical forces" has "the ability to make choices independently, without being constrained by external forces or predetermined conditions." Here we already face an issue: since all the internal constraints are subject to external forces, such as weather or the availability of food or the genetics of the parents or the inheritance they left the human being. To be generous, we just ignore this issue. Instead we consider two human beings A and B. A can't move into the spatial configuration of B, since that would by axiom 3 make human being A equal to B. Therefore A's free will is constrained by B's existence. Therefor A is not a free entity by the definition of free entity and free will. Therefore the notion of free will for human beings (as it is commonly understood) is in complete conflict with common sense. So one may wonder why would anyone even argue about free will or introduce this concept at all. One theory is that free will was introduced to make it easier to place blame on someone. I.e. free will is a form of scapegoating, where collective guilt is eliminated by picking some person to be responsible for the common failure. Say when an impoverished person is forced to do shoplifting, that isn't the society's fault, but the shoplifter's fault. A trans girl can't function as a man? That is the trans girl's fault to man-up! Free will is probably one of the most toxic concepts ever conceived, since it is at the root of most social problems. Until humanity learns to accept the absence of free will, the progress will be slow. Current Mood: contemplative Current Music: Hitoshi Sakimoto - Fate (56 Comments | Comment on this)

<< Previous Day

2024/09/19 [Calendar]

Next Day >>