Where did someone ask you that? Who did that? Did you make this question up for the sake of making the post?

Rust isn't ideal because of the "crates" ecosystem consisting of NPMesque microdependencies, also with the nature of the module system making certain crates like "serde" infectious and mandatory. The borrowing system can be too restrictive for certain types of programs, but OKish for other. I believe it's certainly not the last word in making native code safe. There must be a better solution. It's async part is in a semi-broken state for multiple reasons. Rust is also isn't that fast. I coded several programs in it in parallel with a java implementation, and in most cases, in the vanilla, intuitively readable form, java was just faster and easier to program. Reference counting is just dumb.

As for all the transgenders and homosexuals and woke "punch nazis" jewish commies in the community -- it's just a reflection of the western society. ANY new language with the younger western demographics of developers and users will be like that today. One can't do anything about it without being at least a multi billionaire. One has to endure.

>So I prefer the based old school languages, like LISP, REFAL, POP-11 and C.

You observably prefer to be jobless, live in poverty, inject toxins into your body. Nobody should listen to what you have to say about these kind of decisions.