Not Iranians fault that {the story about creation of Israel from the Iranian point of view, that mentions western imperialism, the preposterousness of 2000 year old myth giving a legitimate claim, an organized colonization campaign with locals having no legal say about it due to the occupation by westerners, ethnic cleansing, their Muslim brothers being oppressed, their need to stand their ground etc}

Дробные числительные не склоняются и встречаются как в функции определения.

Например:

na anderhalf jaar — через полтора года
in een halve eeuw — за половину столетия
twee derde dag — две трети дня

Так и в самостоятельном употреблении.

Например:

Hij kreeg een derde van de som. — Он получил одну треть этой суммы.

OMG, YOU ARE SO FUCKING RETARDED.

As I said earlier, half of the Wikipedia links you post are either irrelevant or outright wrong.

Another name for Iranians is PERSIANS, not Babylonians, the historic Persians are their ancestors, and it's the Persians who defeated the Babylonyans and it's the Cyrus the Great, the Persian king, who released the Jews from Babylonian captivity.

Babylonians correspond more closely to the various peoples of Iraq.

>reflected even in Bible:

Also reflected in the Bible Jews genodiding entire peoples on the supposed order of their God. Some ancient happening at the year BC isn't the argument, because basically everyone was a piece of shit. [1]

[1]'When the Israelites arrive in the Promised Land, they are commanded to annihilate "the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites"'

And of course Ancient Israelite society allowed slavery. The Bible has rules regarding their treatment.

>Watch 300 movie.

Ah yes, watching jewlihood's movie about Persians going to give an objective view of history. /s

Spartans who are the "heroes" of that movie, were the most toxically masculine and the foremost slave owning pieces of shit among all Greeks.

About its historical accuracy from Wikipedia you like to cite:

'Ephraim Lytle, assistant professor of Hellenistic history at the University of Toronto, said that 300 selectively idealized Spartan society in a "problematic and disturbing" fashion and portrayed the "hundred nations of the Persians" as monsters and non-Spartan Greeks as weak. He suggested that the film's moral universe would have seemed "as bizarre to ancient Greeks as it does to modern historians."'

" Diodorus' statement about Greek valor to preserve their liberty is inserted in the film, but his mention of Persian valor is omitted. Herodotus' fanciful numbers are used to populate the Persian army, and Plutarch's discussion of Greek women, specifically Spartan women, is inserted wrongly in the dialogue between the "misogynist" Persian ambassador and the Spartan king. Classical sources are certainly used, but exactly in all the wrong places, or quite naively."

"Kaveh Farrokh, in the paper "The 300 Movie: Separating Fact from Fiction,"[100] noted that the film falsely portrayed "the Greco-Persian Wars in binary terms: the democratic, good, rational 'Us' versus the tyrannical, evil and irrational, 'other' of the ever-nebulous (if not exotic) 'Persia'". He highlighted three points regarding the contribution of the Achaemenid Empire to the creation of democracy and human rights: "The founder of the Achaemenid Empire, Cyrus the Great, was the world's first emperor to openly declare and guarantee the sanctity of human rights and individual freedom.... Cyrus was a follower of the teachings of Zoroaster, the founder of one of the world's oldest monotheistic religions.... When Cyrus defeated King Nabonidus of Babylon, he officially declared the freedom of the Jews from their Babylonian captivity. This was the first time in history that a world power had guaranteed the survival of the Jewish people, religion, customs and culture." He abolished slavery.[101]"