|
|
| Некто написал, |
>hypercapitalist
I don't even care to know what that word was supposed to precisely mean. Larry Ellison might be a dick, but some of his software products I interacted with do function well enough. And his companies operate much better than some leftist opensource projects, full of infighting between leftists, with regular accusations of fascism and racism.
>which ordered building of new reactors was Obama's
He didn't order shit, his administration provided a loan, and his NRC appointee Gregory Jaczko voted against building said reactors. Per usual this shit was wildly over budget and Trump admin gave more money:
https://apnews.com/general-news-38189fb
Building reactors in the US isn't a partisan issue really. People (NIMBYs) just don't want them, and democratically pressure their representatives not to do it. Especially indicative is the story about storing nuclear waste, where the democratic senator from Nevada blocked implementation of that facility. And nuclear energy isn't really cheap nowadays, especially for southern states.
In the republican lead Texas, solar and wind is growing by 30-50% per year for the last decade. And republicans aren't even small government party really. They like to advertise themselves as such, but reality is different. They also give out money on various useful projects. Unless of course there is politics involved, with various non-republican signalling associated with it.
I don't even care to know what that word was supposed to precisely mean. Larry Ellison might be a dick, but some of his software products I interacted with do function well enough. And his companies operate much better than some leftist opensource projects, full of infighting between leftists, with regular accusations of fascism and racism.
>which ordered building of new reactors was Obama's
He didn't order shit, his administration provided a loan, and his NRC appointee Gregory Jaczko voted against building said reactors. Per usual this shit was wildly over budget and Trump admin gave more money:
https://apnews.com/general-news-38189fb
Building reactors in the US isn't a partisan issue really. People (NIMBYs) just don't want them, and democratically pressure their representatives not to do it. Especially indicative is the story about storing nuclear waste, where the democratic senator from Nevada blocked implementation of that facility. And nuclear energy isn't really cheap nowadays, especially for southern states.
In the republican lead Texas, solar and wind is growing by 30-50% per year for the last decade. And republicans aren't even small government party really. They like to advertise themselves as such, but reality is different. They also give out money on various useful projects. Unless of course there is politics involved, with various non-republican signalling associated with it.
Добавить комментарий:
