Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет nancygold ([info]nancygold)
@ 2025-09-12 20:43:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: annoyed
Entry tags:transitioning

Reason I being transmed don't identify with LGBTQ+BLM+Intifada
These trantifa became too violent and intolerant. They generally don't represent my interests or the interests of the actual transsexuals, who just want quiet and affordable transitioning. In fact, you can't even play D&D nowadays without the lefties accusing you of fascism due to you using LLM or because the D&D minis were produced in some sweatshop with underpaid 3rd worlders or because Gygax was conservative or something or because D&D orcs behavior matches the looting niggers.

https://nypost.com/2025/09/11/us-news/gun-charlie-kirk-shot-with-revealed/
Gun recovered in Charlie Kirk assassination revealed — and ammo bore pro-trans, anti-fascist messages

"Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?” an audience member asked Kirk, reports CNN.

“Too many," Kirk responded.

The audience member went on to explain that only a few transgender Americans have perpetrated mass shootings over the last 10 years.

The audience member then asked Kirk if he knew how many mass shooters in total America had seen in the last 10 years.

"Counting or not counting gang violence?” Kirk replied.

Video taken at the event shows that, just seconds later, the sound of a gunshot was heard as Kirk appeared to be struck in the neck while the crowd around him dispersed in a panic. Onlookers shouted, “Run, run, run!”





(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-13 16:34 (ссылка)
>Sustainable for what?

Sustainable for population not declining / self-deleting their culture by being outpopulated by those who don't have 1.0 fertility rate. It's very simple. If Africa doesn't have 1.0 fertility rate, then Africa it is as the inheritor of the planet.

>For reducing human suffering?

So your plan for reduction of human suffering is human extinction? Nice. I dare say typical. In that sense the Ukraine-Russia war is just accelerating that -- why suffer living in Ukraine and Russia when you can stop that existential suffering by enlisting.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]iskramivpeople
2025-09-13 17:23 (ссылка)
Typical rightist demagoguery. Number of people does not translate to dominance or whatsoever, otherwise conquistadors would have been stomped by the overwhelming masses of native americans.
Population decline does not mean extinction, especially so in the case of humans. Human populations through the history have jumped back and forth in numbers, including supposedly down to 1500 ppl during extremes of an ice age. Compared to historical jumps, our future correction is neither novel nor dramatic.
Fun thing about rightists is both these facts are public knowledge and not rocket science, but because of an indoctrination rightists actively choose to ignore inconvenient facts.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-13 20:42 (ссылка)
Demagogery is what regarded leftist khohols do.

>Population decline does not mean

Pretty much means discontinuation of an identity and its associated culture. For example, The West and the Western civilization is pretty much linked to Europeans to a lesser extent to Christianity. If they get outpopulated in their countries, the other civilizations, for example the Muslim one, will prevail, enforcing its accompanying culture, (political, philosophical, epistemological etc etc), a culture much less compatible with technological progress. But leftists are also against limiting immigration, so it's a double whammy of an idiotic policy.

>Human populations through the history have jumped back and forth in numbers

What kind of retarded shit is this? I was saying that your post implied that less people = less suffering. Nobody here was even saying humans are going extinct is the issue, because for sure not everyone is so hellbent on self-extinction. I was talking about cultures identities with their associated ethnicities going extinct together.

I need a technological civilization that could colonize space. Your hedono-leftism preoccupied with "not suffering" to the extent of not even reproducing at the sustainable rates, doesn't satisfy even the bare minimum requirements for that. The conservatism of Charlie Kirk's ilk, however retarded is it, is at the least much better in that regard -- they are supportive of a technological civilization that doesn't go extinct.

And of course I don't fucking care about humans "surviving" in some animal-like state (due to loss of culture, institutions and so on) and tiny numbers. Tiny numbers is anti-humanistic. The number of humans should only be limited by ecological considerations.

The idea that some super advanced but tiny in number civilization could continue existing with any kind of reliability is just dumb.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]iskramivpeople
2025-09-13 20:53 (ссылка)
I've read the post.
1) Identity and culture are fairy tales similar to Tolkien writings, not based in any daily life relevant experience, but rather passed as word of mouth among the followers . Especially so in the modern world, because there are so much of identities and cultures competing, its historically unprecedented.
2) kirk and fanboys are not nearly supporting technological advancement and intergalactic civilization. They are rooting for return to medieval times where there was only one dominant culture and way to live. This is backwards movement and must be eradicated, especially so because it leads to collateral damage like dead women .

Sustainability is a word that have been inflated meaning nowadays, but in original meaning -- ability of a system to reproduce itself -- it is as backwards as stoning of gay ppl. System is always broken and always begging for a fix in a next iteration where ppl will account for the past mistakes. It is always a flux but it can go either forward or backwards not both.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-13 21:03 (ссылка)
>They are rooting for return to medieval times

Bunch of bullshit. Kirk was the mainstremest of mainstream Republicans. Republicans aren't against technology, or reasonable standards of truth. By all standards, their interpretation of the Bible, a bronze age book, with slavery, stoning and so on, is fairly progressive, if looked at the big scale of things, which includes Wahhabis, Taliban, and Haredim, etc.

And I have to remind you that their actually conservative views, are the views that made the west where they are now -- because at least in the 19th and early 20th century the dominant culture was pretty close to what they are preaching.

>it is as backwards

Whatever. It either perpetuates itself, or it ceases to exist, or continutes in highly mutated, altered form, losing key characteristics.

>begging for a fix in a next iteration

The next iteration could be the actual return to the medieval state of affairs, not imaginary, like in case of republicans. And non-reproducing hedonists preoccupied with homosexual's well being are making it ever closer.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]iskramivpeople
2025-09-14 17:28 (ссылка)
> Republicans aren't against technology

Kek listen to trump bitching about wind/solar. You are complete delulu.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-14 18:18 (ссылка)
That's just identity politics. Politics can be irrational here and there. In the big picture of things republicans are more pro technology than the American left. Especially if Trumpism is subtracted, which will soon happen due to the age and term limits.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]iskramivpeople
2025-09-14 19:41 (ссылка)
Gop favors technology in form of larry ellison styled hypercapitalism.
Oil companies are also hypercapitalist and this is why they are firm supporters of trumpism and receive favor in return.
Energy transition is the risky business (less today than decade ago but still) and this is real reason why gop goes against clean energy.
Regarding nuclear, so far last administration which ordered building of new reactors was Obama's. So far white people are incapable of achieving what black person did.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-14 20:22 (ссылка)
>hypercapitalist

I don't even care to know what that word was supposed to precisely mean. Larry Ellison might be a dick, but some of his software products I interacted with do function well enough. And his companies operate much better than some leftist opensource projects, full of infighting between leftists, with regular accusations of fascism and racism.

>which ordered building of new reactors was Obama's

He didn't order shit, his administration provided a loan, and his NRC appointee Gregory Jaczko voted against building said reactors. Per usual this shit was wildly over budget and Trump admin gave more money:

https://apnews.com/general-news-38189fb0550e401da6b339ad9870a007

Building reactors in the US isn't a partisan issue really. People (NIMBYs) just don't want them, and democratically pressure their representatives not to do it. Especially indicative is the story about storing nuclear waste, where the democratic senator from Nevada blocked implementation of that facility. And nuclear energy isn't really cheap nowadays, especially for southern states.

In the republican lead Texas, solar and wind is growing by 30-50% per year for the last decade. And republicans aren't even small government party really. They like to advertise themselves as such, but reality is different. They also give out money on various useful projects. Unless of course there is politics involved, with various non-republican signalling associated with it.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-13 21:13 (ссылка)
>Identity and culture are fairy tales similar to Tolkien writings,

You have to have something irrational at the foundational level in order to prevent "rational" and self-destructive hedonistic dissolution into one culture without regional competition, levels of isolation, etc. If "fairy tales" help prevent that, then "fairy tales" it is. Because nothing is more scary than the planetary monoculture.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]iskramivpeople
2025-09-14 17:32 (ссылка)
Berlin has
more subcultures than whole of Afghanistan
Despite having much less ppl. Medieval
times also had many cultures but in particular region
mostly one was dominant, the situation
is completely different now with so many
subcultures competing in the open. You just
proving one more time this alt right thing is completely backwards.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-14 18:16 (ссылка)
>so many subcultures competing in the open.

The key word here is *subculture*. They have trivial differences. Subculture in the west is mostly a form of entertainment for the idle. The fundamental concepts, moral imperatives etc, are mostly common among those.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]iskramivpeople
2025-09-14 19:42 (ссылка)
"morals" is also fairy tales btw

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-14 19:57 (ссылка)
wow you so smart. You are blowing my mind /s

Ethics, morality, whatever you call it, whatever its true nature may be, is very important -- defines the character of the civilization. A civilization of nihilists existing for any significant time frame is basically an impossibility.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Читать комментарии) -