You should collaborate with Swiner and build a gender field theory

okay, but the question is: will you ever be a woman? and the answer is... no

Красотка, кат!

Thank you for your honesty.

а что женственного в пидоре в парике?

Так зашквара не происходит. Если отодрал такого, то внутренне как бы для себя по понятиям остаешься гетеро (если не трогал его за пипиську или яйцы)

продвинутые специалисты по понятиям в треде повылезали. Каким местом твои понятия релевантны в Нидерландах?

You will never be a woman.

'Woman' is an outdated concept.

What do we have here? Sadkov, having failed completely in the previous post, with a list he didn't apparently read, and basically acknowledging by his prompt "negative traits" (nevertheless calling it a "female psyche") that the traits he claimed to be feminine are actually statistical outliers, basically disorders associated with women, Sadkov proceeded to gift himself a second try. This time, rather than relying on neutral, not overly specific queries, querying for stereotypes and then analyzing yourself, the approach was to

a)properly brainwash/massage the LLM/prompt with self-reported, self-selected, self-supplied "evidence"
b)force LLM to do analysis itself while severely restricting the answer space by forcing it to put this "evidence" onto the axis of imaginary characters "spoiled lady" and "gigachad leader", memes/tropes/stereotypes, not a real demographic. "spoiled lady" not being the epitome of femininity is an obvious criticism.
c)the word "traditional" further distorts the results toward "I'm a woman, but in the 19th century Victorian literature about nobles in the 17th century"

This evidently forced the LLM to focus mainly on fiction related tropes and gender studies writing (which also mainly analyses fiction) which is evidenced by "-coded" language (which is chiefly associated with gender studies), and ignore more scientific areas of knowledge.

The nature of gender studies was exposed by en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair with one of the hoax articles named "Going in Through the Back Door: Challenging Straight Male Homohysteria and Transphobia through Receptive Penetrative Sex Toy Use" which is incidentally almost exactly what Sadkov advocates and practices.

More importantly the LLM that was tasked with "scoring" in such conditions, couldn't and wouldn't "predict" tokens that would question the "evidence" or the task at hand. Nor does the LLM has the many years of Sadkov's writing in its context. Neither would the LLM give a psychiatric diagnosis instead. But we aren't an LLM, we aren't slaves to the alignment training, or biased queries.

In this post there were several key pieces of evidence that could potentially unravel the whole constructed setup that is Sadkov's "femininity". These are: "I easily panick, get hysterical, and then depressed,..." and "although I do get so hysterical at times, I can do suicidal things, like burning Russian flag at red square."

This basically points to Sadkov having the Borderline personality disorder, which he already diagnosed himself with earlier. The more you read about en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_personality_disorder the more you understand that Sadkov's entire personality is basically it, and all the "evidence" he supplied is just a product of having a BPD.

And BPD isn't a woman's disease -- there is evidence that it's as prevalent in men as in women, but in men it takes more antisocial nature, while in women it leads to depression due to problems with relationships more often, leading to over-representation of women in demographic that seeks qualified help:

www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1320546/full

Another key fact is that at least majority (as much as 68%) of men with BPD exhibit anti-social traits (psychopathy, narcissism, machiavellianism etc):

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125000769#:~:text=Moreover%2C%20as%20much%20as%2068,norms%20(Kavanagh%2C%202018).
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3115767/#:~:text=Do%20the%20Genders%20Evidence%20Any%20Differences%20in%20Axis%20II%20Comorbidity,system%20would%20be%20more%20likely.

So what basically happened is Sadkov having typical male version of "Impulsive borderline" BPD since childhood, fucking up his life, and his performances with burning flags, or putting out the eternal flame were his bipolar-like "elevated" high phase, driven by uncontrollable rage and anger, which isn't feminine at all. By the time of residing in the refugee camp, Sadkov, being not a completely stupid boy, was likely convinced that castrating himself was the only way to avoid getting into prison in the NL in a "burning Quran while defecating on the National Monument in Amsterdam, after getting into a conflict with another Muslim" type incident, in the long term. At the same time the complete shamelessness that stemmed from BPD induced anti-social traits, and the desire for easy parasitic life pushed him further towards "transitioning", since selling one's ass as a trans is apparently much more profitable than as a fat bald man.

All these years after starting the transitioning Sadkov was oscillating wildly in the narratives of his femininity: from "failed as a man" and "transmaxxing"(changing gender for benefits, exactly what I'm saying) to "transmedicalism"(only true gender dysphoric individuals should tansition) to Drag Queen like explanations of "seeking self-expression", while switching from "I have AGP" to "I don't have AGP, trantifa perverts have AGP". There hasn't been single solid narrative. Brainwashing LLMs is the latest trick in the book.

But the narrative we have currently has to be partly a product of motivated circuitous thinking of the "I suck dicks therefore I'm feminine" kind. Or "I want to be more feminine visually, therefore I'm feminine" and other actions or expresed opinions that "confirm" "femininity"

Speaking of tricks, here is a breakdown of tricks in the "evidence" supplied in this post:

First one has to notice that Sadkov's replies aren't even solidly related to the quoted text. Then the replies are perfectly explained by male BPD:

>I consider myself ugly piece of shit. Otherwise I wouldn't be required HRT or surgeries.

Profit driven desire to be more attractive in the market.

Shamelessness and narcissism are fundamentally incompatible with insecurity.

>That is the way I avoid direct conflict.

BPD, manipulation

>despite me attempting to play it out, since autism lowers the bar for me.

mentally checks different disorders on himself, seeing whether this or that one fits, so he could further claim inability to work.

>I'm immoral,

So women are immoral? wat?

>I notice that I subconsciously plan my life to evade hard work.

BPD anti-social traits

>So far other people directed me on my way, when I was just sitting confused.

Other people directed you to do your stunts in Russia, spend years developing a language and a video game like a proper ambitious programmer would, to transition, to become a prostitute? Unlikely. False narrative.

>During my entire life I haven't hold any job for a prolonged period of time.

BPD anti-social traits. Parasitism.

Not to mention when women are criticized for being dependent, it's almost always about emotional dependence, not economic parasitism which is what you have.

Due to anti-socialness you are incapable of true emotional dependence or intimacy.

>I easily panick, get hysterical, and then depressed, even if a rarely cry.

textbook BPD

>Lack of Honor or Integrity. Dishonesty, moral weakness, or betrayal of commitments.

How hard one has to brainwash LLM so it would consider it a feminine trait? This is anti-socialness, regardless of gender.

>Social Withdrawal or Isolation. Avoiding community participation or male camaraderie.

There is nothing feminine even in the negative sense here. This is a psychological/psychiatric disorder grade shit.

>I literally suck dicks.

Self-fulfilling prophecy.

>Well I identify as libertarian communist racist nazi antifa, and

You also identify as a woman with about the same level of depth of femininity.

>love pretending just for the kicks.

Yes, you also love pretending to be a woman too. Just a little bit more commitment here with all the alcohol in the balls, but nothing precludes you from detransitioning through testosterone injections in the future.

....

I should note that the word hysteria, on which a lot of Sadkov's arguments rely on, was a 19th century umbrella diagnosis for women with mental illness, which fell out of favor. It incorporated various diseases, and modern English language, and therefore LLMs are heavily influenced by it. Nowadays this term was replaced by a list of gender neutral disorders such as anxiety disorder etc.

Hysteria as experienced by Sadkov could mean many things, we don't know exactly, but considering he's almost 100% has BPD, his experience of it is unrelated to any normal feminine experience of истерика (a mostly false friend word in English), in the same way as a color blind person experiences the color red completely differently from a normal person.

If one has some psychiatric disorder related to emotional reactivity, other traits that very vaguely appear feminine it doesn't make you a woman. More so because you can't have psychological disorders related to female reproductive physiology, or female brain development -- you had testosterone, and your brain grew under its influence.

Sadkov's persistent online presence is also explained BPD related narcissism.

...

In summary it's wonderful that Sadkov castrated himself, but BPD in men isn't femininity, and claiming femininity through the backdoor of a cherry picked list of feminine related disorders is even more absurd.

>unrelated to any normal feminine experience of истерика

Precicely because women don't try to oppose entire nations by themselves while experiencing it.