Пес Ебленский - Озарение [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
rex_weblen

[ website | Наши рисуночки ]
[ userinfo | ljr userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| update journal edit friends fif tiphareth recent comments ]

Озарение [Apr. 7th, 2021|08:40 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
[Tags|]
[Current Mood | exhausted]

Не спал несколько дней

Понял одну важную вещь.

Оказывается Москва это гигантский эмбрион.

А районы это разные органы.

А метро это кровеносная система.

И пересадочные станции в центре самые важные как сердце кровь качает.

А по индуизму из каждой части тела берется своя каста

А хуй сосется и находится во рту, то есть в голове.

Поэтому в хую тоже Брахманы.

Тем более конец хуя называется головка.
LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:14 pm
(Link)
зато в куеве каждый район это головка от хуя
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:46 pm
(Link)
ты же понимаешь что сообщаешь всё о себе, а не комментируешь пост?
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:55 pm
(Link)
ты из куева чоли? ну звиняй. дерьмо-городишко.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 09:18 pm
(Link)
да уж. бывает
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:16 pm
(Link)
тебя саша зовут?
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:22 pm
(Link)
this post was rollercoaster from start to finish
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:23 pm
(Link)
ты ебанулся
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:39 pm
(Link)
Да пошел ты нахуй.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 08:49 pm
(Link)
Два часа не сосал, а как уже хочется. Каклы пидары, кстати


mfr
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 7th, 2021 - 09:11 pm
(Link)
Соси,рюсня. На бутылку!9
[User Picture]
From:[info]lookatburatino
Date:April 8th, 2021 - 04:46 am
(Link)
Отдохнуть бы тебе надо. Особливо от всех этих мыслей.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 8th, 2021 - 08:51 am
(Link)
а ты, везучая
ёбаная
коли б мне вчера не было лениво, я б уж выборы короля чуханов-то объявил ITT
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 8th, 2021 - 02:44 pm
(Link)
ёбаная не везучая, а живучая. за раз 10 хуёв в сраку принимает и даже не морщится.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 8th, 2021 - 03:09 pm
(Link)
А чего морщиться? Ты на ровном месте уселся на хуй -- я привычно поставил галочку в акт приёмки. Вот как сейчас, глупенький омежка.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 8th, 2021 - 03:16 pm
(Link)
ёбаная, залогинься
From:[info]phantom
Date:April 10th, 2021 - 05:46 pm
(Link)
А что не спится?
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 30th, 2021 - 09:04 am
(Link)
[The ancient Greeks] didn't have any full-blown science. Natural science in the sense that is relevant was founded by Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). He figured out the methodology to invent competing hypotheses and to eliminate the wrong ones by experiments (he first eliminated wrong theories about how marbles accelerate when they fall from the Tower of Pisa). You may quote other "fathers of science" such as Francis Bacon (1561-1626) but that won't change anything about the timing.

Ancient Greek Thales (620s BC-540s BC) was a father of "science" only to the extent that he recommended to avoid superstitions. But that is very insufficient to produce real scientific laws – which are needed for the steam engine etc. The ancient Greeks didn't know the parabolic trajectories of Galileo, Newton's laws, the quantitative concept of force, and even the temperature scales, among lots of other things (I am not even talking about electromagnetism let alone quantum mechanics, relativity, and string theory). The "pure scientific knowledge" was clearly the main thing that prevented them from introducing technologies of the modern era – and it is almost always like that. Idiots such as this retarded xer_wjeblenskiy never respect any science and how incredibly hard it is. They think it always exists and leftist activists who make it work for the people are the only hard thing!

How did the industrial revolution start, and it did so mainly in England? Do you remember James Watt (1736-1819)? He constructed the steam engine, right? Muscles were suddenly replaced with burning coal and steam. Was Watt – whose surname is used as the international unit of power today – a purely skillful guy who didn't need any insights from Newton and two centuries of physicists who were building on him? Don't be silly. Watt had to get – and did get – an extremely good education in mathematics and physical technology of his era.

Watt's father was a ship builder and ship contractor and James could have played with the ships. This shipwright's father, James' granddad Thomas Watt, was a teacher of mathematics, surveying, and navigation. His family had a direct access to the state-of-the-art STEM fields. Was James building on the science of ancient Greece? Well, Wikipedia makes it clear that he displayed aptitude for mathematics and no interest in Greek and Latin! ;-) Surely this relationship with mathematics was only a matter of James' childhood, right? No. He worked in his dad's factories but when those ran to business problems, James Watt left for Glasgow to build... mathematical instruments!

Then you see he was inspired by seeing a kettle boiling and started to play with steam and steam engines. But without the (nearly) state-of-the-art knowledge of physics, no one could possibly build such a thing. (Thomas Newcomen built an earlier steam engine that Watt has improved. Newcomen also had some science background, mostly from the things taught to priests, but it wasn't enough, his engine wasn't great, and the improvement from Newcomen's to Watt's engine took 1776-1712=64 long years.) A particular reason is that almost everyone who is illiterate in physics gets stuck in inventing various "perpetuum mobile" devices which just cannot work (just like physically illiterate 21st century people are excited by superluminal warp drives, cold fusion, loop quantum gravity, anti-Copenhagen "interpretations" of quantum mechanics, and dozens of similar pseudosciences). Watt knew what creates the power, the required watts to make things moving. Aristoteles just couldn't possibly complete these tasks. The ancient Greeks failed to understand not only the basic mechanics but also thermodynamics, chemistry, technologies to change the shape of iron, and many other crucial things.

I am convinced that most fifth-graders still do understand that the ancient Greeks didn't know the temperature, didn't have any pistons (1826... in the combustion engines), didn't understand the laws of thermodynamics, electromagnetism... and almost everything else that we count as physics, chemistry, and other natural sciences, so they could not have "applied" this non-existent knowledge. This commenter's stupidity is off the charts. But I am also almost certain that this kind of stupidity has become widespread and it is being tolerated if not encouraged. His teachers have failed to spank this bastard. And when he says a lie against slavery, he escapes the spanking lesson once again, every single day.

But it is not just the lack of education about the history, mathematics, and physics. He must completely lack any common sense. It is simply common sense that all scientific theories and technologies have their time and there are pretty good reasons why they didn't arrive centuries earlier. There are reasons – and these reasons are not just an insufficiently left-wing political leadership – why the cavemen didn't drive electric bikes and Homo Australopithecus didn't land on the Moon. The scientific and technological advances almost always depend on many other things. Sid Meier's Civilization games must have been very useful pedagogic instruments because they must make the players understand how science depends on a previous one – and some degree of overproduction or economic prosperity – and vice versa. Scientific and technological breakthroughs depend on others. And an excess of wealth (which often needs to be produced by brute force if not many slaves' drudgery) is needed for luxurious activities such as the scientific research that is needed for a higher level of luxury (and less back-breaking occupations) in the future, and so on.
[User Picture]
From:[info]rex_weblen
Date:April 30th, 2021 - 07:33 pm

Doxa!

(Link)
https://motls.blogspot.com/2021/04/ancient-greeks-couldnt-have-started.html?m=1

I never meant that ancient Greeks got any 'full blown science'. I only meant that Aristotle started physics as a scientific tradition. I never claimed that it was as modern science, and could produce a t scientific revolution with stuff like steam engines.

However, I don't agree that Ancient Greeks had no physics. Greeks never had physics as in 'full blown science' of The Reference Frame, but they clearly created physics as a placeholder for the future science. What I mean by this is that Aristotle and Thales created a framework for systematic study of change of the meterial substance. As Thales is sort of a mythical figure, I will talk only about Aristotle. Aristotle achieved this by introducing clear concepts of motion, causality and so on. And what is especially important he defined the limits of the physical discourse.

Reiterating my original point of view, this means that by initiating he started physics as a literary tradition, which a scientific tradition is a particular case of. As time passed this tradition evolved and was revolutionized, in particular, by work of Galileo and Newton. But is still retained the same tradition. Which, and this is my key point here, makes it European (in particular Hellenistic) scientific traditions in the same sense that Taoism is a Chinese religious tradition, and yoga is an Indian tradition. This means that advocating against eurocentrism and dead white man in a physics classroom is the same as advocating against dead Chinese man in a Tao class, or claiming that yoga belongs to Californian culture to the same degree as it belongs to the Indian. And proving this was the main reason I started this discussion of science as european tradition.