Пес Ебленский - Post a comment [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
rex_weblen

[ website | Наши рисуночки ]
[ userinfo | ljr userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| update journal edit friends fif tiphareth recent comments ]

Russian-Ukrainian Situation Jul. 10th, 2019|07:42 pm

rex_weblen
I forgot why I wanted to write this post. But from now on all essay-style posts would be in English. Forest Hill posts would still be Russian. While stupid small posts might be in any language. The reason for this is that Russian ist das sprache of bydlo is the need to train myself. And one thing that fits this format I need to practice is controversial essays on ljr.

To understand current state of Russian-Ukrainian relations one need to understand governance forms of these countries. I don't see any use in a classification of government forms beyond that was introduced by Plato. So I will stick to it. In this classification Russia is tyranny, but not a purebred one. It is fakebred one. Paradoxically, it is a fake tyranny and fake democracy at the same time . It's true nature all hidden behind the facade of dysfunctional democratic institutions. The personality of the tyrant here is also a source of deception. Everything here cries of the greatness of president Putin, but truly this man is just a cog in a convoluted PR machine. The image of supreme leader is important here because this the strong hand it the only thing that majority of subhuman population here recognize. The true tyrant here is faceless committee of 'KGB' agents worshiping the holy spirit of the Strong Hand. On the other hand, Ukraine is an oligarchy, and the politics here are driven by the contest of clans. At most moments in modern history only one clan rules supreme. For example, now it is Kalomoyski clan, and before it was Dnipr clan, and before it was Donetsky clan. By they have to change each other at the reigning position according to the election cycle. Then Donetsky clan tried to usurp whole power it was swiped by the Maydan. And the cycle of oligarchic clans exchanging power continued.

So what we see, is that Ukraine and Russia represent two different modes of governance on the post-soviet space. Actually, the only possible forms of governance here. And any country there can shift to one to another. So, the true reason of Russian animosity towards Ukraine is not the language and any other shit, but the fact that it represents an standard of the oligarchic governance type different from the Russian one fake strong hand tyranny. The evidence for this are countries like Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan hostile towards Russian national culture but are friendly with ongoing Russian government because they all stay for the strong-hand tyranny. This is because Russian Tyranny would gladly spit in the faces of it's subhuman serfs in order support it's leadership on post-soviet space. Showing that other system of governance can be sustained here, may inspire other countries to change. Moreover, it may inspire Russian oligarchic clans to go for a cope against Petersburg clan and demand a cycle of power. And the state of seven bankers in 90's was a nightmare for ongoing nulling spook-class of Russia.
So they will do anything not to allow it happen again.

It seems that russian ruling spook-class colluded with Yanukovich to make him a big boss of Ukraine alike Putin. But Ukrainian oligarchy knew how to fight back. Moreover, it most Ukrainian oligarchs were friendly towards Putin system at some point, but the persistent arrogance and privileged attitude towards Yanukovich maid them extremely hostile towards Putin. This also draw them to support radical nationalists. These radical nationalists are another important factor of Ukrainian politics. It seems that their intellectual core are formed by ultraradical humanitarians focused on promoting 'the correct Ukrainian language' and their correct views at history at all costs. They produced strife around education and this strife was used as mane way to drag ordinary people into russian-ukrainean conflict. However, as it was noted above it is not the main source of russian-Ukrainian conflict itself. In my opinion, language-politics is something disgusting and history shouldn't be taught at schools at all, at least as it taught today.

The two main bleeding wounds of Russian-Ukrainian relations are Crimea and Donbass. It seems that Crimea was annexed as a reaction to a thread Black Sea navy being denied a port at Sevastopol. And it seems that this operation had been planned long before by the navy itself. The threat itself mast have been a provocation by Ukrainian nazis, as they are the only one who benefited from the ongoing crisis, as their narrative, which was marginal before, now can be pushed upon the population. On the other hand, the donbass is something far more messy, and was performed by volunteer russian nazis at large and financed by a retardedly rich and richly retarded person named Malafeev. Due to lack of natural borders the war was sparked and many people died there, but this is another story. Many important Russian top-retards like Dugin, Kurginyan and Galkovsky were promoting war in Donbass, but russian nazi-movement was fractured as result of it. So it is very hard to find real beneficiaries of this event.

Loosing Crimea was a tough morale wound for Ukraine and the system of oligarchy as whole. Recognizing Crimea as Russian territory would be a symbolic suicide for any Ukrainian public person. But as a nihilist I spit on everything symbolic. And what Ukraine should do, in my opinion, is to recognize Crimea as a Russian territory and grand independence to Donbass. Moreover, it should expel all other eastern shitholes, which voted for Medvedchuk in recent electing. Leaving all the trash behind will allow Ukraine to move forward and joint. Putting some western nukes at Poletavshina will allow ukraine to sway away from Russian and old soviet influences. And this should be the main priority now! Only by adjoining forces with the USA Ukraine can move from oligarchy towards true democracy. However, It seems that not all oligarchs and nazis are happy with this plan.

Concerning the situation with Russia. I don't see any metaphysical problems with crimea being Russian per se. However, I don't support methods of achieving this. By acquiring Crimea it lost one important thing. And this is the credit of trust sustained from late 90s. Most russians would laugh at comparison of something as material as rightful russian clay and something as immaterial as trust. However, This is only because of primtive level of development of this subhuman trash. The results of this new distrust are already pretty visible as sanctions, and sanctions because sanctions. And they will make Russian diplomacy a living hell. However, I wouldn't be so optimistic over all. There are many economically viable reasons to have good relations with Russia. So Crimea may be recignised as a Russian territory in a long run.
Link Read Comments

Reply:
From:
Identity URL: 
имя пользователя:    
Вы должны предварительно войти в LiveJournal.com
 
E-mail для ответов: 
Вы сможете оставлять комментарии, даже если не введете e-mail.
Но вы не сможете получать уведомления об ответах на ваши комментарии!
Внимание: на указанный адрес будет выслано подтверждение.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
Message: