Data Center Knowledge | News and analysis for the data center industry - Industr's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Friday, September 2nd, 2016

    Time Event
    12:00p
    Data Center Connectivity: Dare to Bypass New York?

    If you want traffic from your data center to reach Europe, you have to get it to one of the submarine cable landing stations along North America’s east coast. There is a couple in Canada, but most of them are in the US, with the highest concentrations in the New York metro and at the southern tip of Florida. Most submarine cable routes to Europe land in the New York metro, while Florida is the primary gateway to Central and South Americas.

    Getting your traffic to one of the landing stations in New York or New Jersey isn’t simple. If you’re a bank, for example, it isn’t just a matter of signing a contract with one of the cable operators and getting your technicians to light up a fiber line between your data center and a landing station. You have to go through middlemen, companies that will backhaul your traffic to an access point somewhere in a colocation data center – which can be close to or far from shore – and then to the landing station itself.

    If your data center is in Ashburn, Chicago, or Denver, and you want to move traffic to Europe or South America via a landing station in New Jersey, you would normally have to backhaul it first to one of the big carrier hotels in Manhattan – Google-owned 111 8th Avenue, Digital Realty’s 60 Hudson Street, or 32 Avenue of the Americas (which was actually at one time the main AT&T building for transatlantic connectivity) – from where telcos who are members of consortia that operate submarine cables would take it to the New Jersey landing station.

    See alsoTen Most Connected Data Centers

    But the company behind a new data center launched recently on the New Jersey coast says your traffic no longer has to take that detour. New Jersey Fiber Exchange has built what its founder, Gil Santaliz, describes as a data center campus around a landing station in Manasquan, a borough in the Garden State’s Monmouth County, where four submarine cables land now and one more is expected to come online next year.

    Legacy Carrier Hotels No Longer Only Option

    The landing station is owned by Tata Communications, and the NJFX data center provides direct connectivity to submarine cables that land there. It is unique in that it is adjacent to the landing-station facility, which is closed to everyone other than the cable operators, as all cable landing stations usually are, according to Santaliz.

    The NJFX founder has been deeply involved in the region’s connectivity market for years. He was a founder of 4Connections, a provider of dark fiber in New Jersey acquired by Cablevision subsidiary Optimum Lightpath in 2008. Prior to that he was general manager for a joint venture between GPU Telecom and Telergy, which leased fiber in the Mid-Atlantic region.

    See also: Transpacific Data Center Connectivity Hub Launches in Seattle

    Removing a Choke Point

    Although there are carrier hotels in New Jersey — the biggest one being at 165 Halsey Street in Newark, where you can access at least one of the submarine cables that land in Manasquan, called Apollo — according to Santaliz, the bulk of transatlantic traffic travels through the legacy network hubs in New York City.

    This model, he says, was devised before September 11 and before Hurricane Sandy. Both disasters took out significant portions of telecommunications infrastructure in Manhattan, and having an alternative route makes New York less of a choke point.

    When he was running 4Connections, all banks he talked to wanted direct access to landing stations, but operators wouldn’t let them, he recalls. And that demand is still there today. “They don’t want to depend on backhaul that’s unpredictable.”

    The new cable that’s due to go live next year, called Seabras-1, will connect New Jersey to Praia Grande, Brazil. Banking is one sector “that’s extremely interested in that Brazilian piece, as well as European direct access,” Santaliz says.

    Content providers are also interested and of course carriers. These are the three big verticals NJFX is catering to. When the company launched a meet-me room at the site, it inherited 11 carriers that were already connecting to the landing station. Three more carriers came on board since.

    NJFX charges customers for data center space and for connections to the meet-me room: a 24-count cable to the meet-me room costs $1,500 per month. It does not, however, charge for interconnects that link customers inside the facility to each other.

    Previously, the meet-me room had been limited to carriers only, but now that the official data center launch date is near (September 21), it is open to enterprises, such as banks and content providers. Carriers that are already there are making new deals every day, Santaliz says. “The amount of traffic in that facility is staggering.”

    4:12p
    Google and Amazon Vie for Big Inroad Into Wall Street Data Trove

    (Bloomberg) — Trying to understand what causes flash crashes is no longer just for financial regulators and Wall Street. It’s a big deal in Silicon Valley too.

    Since billions of dollars were quickly erased from U.S. stocks in May 2010, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has been trying to create a massive repository that would track stock and options trading from exchanges and broker-dealers on a daily basis. That way regulators could quickly go back and find clues to what caused a market interruption. The lack of progress was highlighted last August when the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1,100 points in the first few minutes of trading, sending regulators scrambling once again to figure out what went wrong.

    Technology giants like Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. are jumping at the chance to help build the storage for the exchanges via their cloud services. That’s intensified resistance by Wall Street, since the new database, known as the Consolidated Audit Trail, or CAT, could include personal information such as names and addresses from more than 100 million customer accounts. Brokers and banks are worried about everything from data breaches to technology firms making one of their biggest inroads yet into the financial world.

    “This is a huge opportunity for Amazon and Google,” said Jo Ann Barefoot, a senior fellow at Harvard University who studies fintech and a former official at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. “Their involvement in this project I do think is a threat to the incumbents. If big tech firms can win more trust in Washington, that’s one of the biggest challenges facing banks.”

    Big Data

    Data is playing an increasingly important role in the financial services industry as services such as lending and managing money become more reliant on analyzing market trends. The big data market for financial services is expected to increase to $53.4 billion in 2017 from $32.1 billion in 2015, according to a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

    Right now if the SEC wants trading information it can take days. That’s because it often has to cobble it together from different systems run by the exchanges and Wall Street-funded overseer, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Under the CAT system, regulators would be able to see data from the previous day’s orders by noon the following day.

    That information could be stored in a cloud, where it would be encrypted and the SEC would be able to access it remotely, rather than on in-house servers. Amazon and Google’s cloud businesses already keep data for other companies, including rivals, without providing the tech firms with access to it. The agency declined to comment on the teams bidding to run CAT.

    “We think CAT will certainly facilitate our ability to do our job,” Steve Luparello, the SEC’s director of the division of trading and markets, said in an interview. “As the August event of 2015 pointed out, we have access to all the data we need, but it’s labor-intensive and time-consuming to aggregate all that data and begin that analysis.”

    Luparello said the SEC expects the initial phase of CAT, which will include stock and options data collected from the exchanges and Finra, but not order information from broker-dealers, will be operational by the end of next year.

    ‘Treasure Trove’

    Lobbying by industry trade groups has mounted, with the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, which represents the biggest broker-dealers, complaining about potential costs for its members in a July letter to the SEC. The agency has estimated that CAT implementation costs for exchanges and broker-dealers could be about $2.4 billion, while the firms’ expenses for maintaining the records would be about the same at $1.7 billion.

    The Investment Company Institute, whose members include some of the biggest asset managers, also sent a letter last month, outlining its security concerns. “This treasure trove of order and execution information has tremendous commercial value, and we are gravely concerned that cyber criminals and others will seek to access and use it for their personal gain to the detriment of funds and their shareholders,” David Blass, general counsel at ICI, wrote in the letter.

    Amazon is working with Finra in its bid to build CAT, after the regulator migrated 90 percent of its data, such as brokerage transaction records, to Amazon’s cloud services. Financial technology firm Fidelity National Information Services Inc. has partnered with Google to vie for the contract. Winning would help expand the technology firms’ cloud computing, one of their fastest growing businesses. Building CAT could cost as much as $92 million initially and then $93 million annually for maintenance, according to estimates published in April.

    Last month, Amazon said that in the second quarter its cloud-computing division delivered operating income of $718 million — 56 percent of the company’s total, while accounting for only 9.5 percent of revenue. Meanwhile, Alphabet beat analyst estimates last quarter in part due to gains in its cloud-computing business.

    No Peeking

    Amazon and Google’s potential role in CAT has also stoked fears about what the technology giants’ broader, long-term goals may be in financial services. Some worry that any insight into what could be the world’s largest repository of securities transactions will provide ways for either company to profit beyond cloud services.

    Still, the business opportunity for Amazon and Google to provide cloud-computing services is so big that it makes little sense for the companies to risk alienating clients by peeking at their data. Neither company has said it has plans to get involved in the trading business. It’s also specified in the CAT proposal that whoever wins the bid must ensure the security and confidentiality of the data, and agree to use it only for appropriate surveillance and regulatory activities. Spokesmen for the firms declined to comment on their involvement to build CAT.

    Werner Vogels, chief technology officer at Amazon, said at an event earlier this month that lower costs and greater security were two of the primary reasons customers shift data from their own servers to Amazon’s.

    Finra Recusal

    The SEC is expected to weigh in on the CAT plan in November and the winner will be chosen by January by the exchanges. Since Finra is one of the finalists, it’s recused itself from the selection process. The third contender is led by Thesys Technologies, a financial technology firm. Given the technology overhaul required, and controversy over security and costs, the project could be years away from completion.

    Finra’s move to the cloud cut costs, while also bolstering data security and surveillance capabilities, according to Steve Randich, the regulator’s chief information officer. Firms, banks, broker-dealers and other regulators have asked for information on how Finra outsourced its data storage, he said.

    “There is resistance, but it is fading,” said Randich. “You could measure the sentiment change by the week.”

    5:20p
    QTS Appoints Its First Cybersecurity Chief

    QTS Realty Trust has become one of the first data center service providers to appoint a Chief Information Security Officer.

    The company has hired Andrew Wild to fill the newly created position. Wild formerly served as chief security officer at Lancope, an Alpharetta, Georgia-based information security company acquired by Cisco last September to advance its enterprise security strategy.

    None of the other five publicly traded US data center REITs have a CISO. Jon Greaves, QTS CTO, explained in a statement that the company decided to invest in the new position because security threats are “evolving day by day.”

    QTS differs from the other REITs in that it also provides a variety of managed and cloud services in addition to raw data center capacity. Customers can access other services in the other REITs’ facilities, but those are provided by their partners rather than by the REITs themselves.

    See also: QTS Launches Public OpenStack Cloud

    As a managed service and cloud provider, QTS is likely to have a bigger need for in-house cybersecurity know-how than the other data center providers do.

    Prior to joining Lancope in 2014, Wild served as CSO at Qualys, a cybersecurity firm that went public in 2012. Before Qualys, he was manager of information security engineering at EMC.

    For the last two years he has been a startup mentor and advisor at Mach37, a Washington, DC-area accelerator focused on cybersecurity.

    << Previous Day 2016/09/02
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

Data Center Knowledge | News and analysis for the data center industry - Industry News and Analysis About Data Centers   About LJ.Rossia.org