Data Center Knowledge | News and analysis for the data center industry - Industr's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Friday, January 13th, 2017

    Time Event
    4:39p
    Northern Virginia Data Center Growth Outpaces Renewables

    An area encompassing several cities in Northern Virginia, just outside of Washington, D.C., is quite possibly home to the world’s largest concentration of data centers. Be it Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, Google, or Uber, every major tech company with a large-scale internet platform either operates its own data centers in what we refer to as the Northern Virginia data center market, leases space from the numerous data center providers there, or uses cloud servers running in one or several of those facilities.

    Economic development officials in Loudoun County, where the bulk of Northern Virginia’s data center capacity is located, claim that 70 percent of global internet traffic passes through county borders daily. Regardless of whether or not that’s actually true, the region is clearly one of the internet’s biggest and most important nerve centers (read up on how it came to be that way here). And, as the nature of such nerve centers dictates, it is only growing bigger. The bigger the ecosystem, the more players want in.

    But, as this already massive cluster of internet infrastructure continues snowballing, environmental activists are starting to ring alarm bells about the sources of energy that keep it chugging along. As Greenpeace pointed out in its latest Clicking Clean report that came out earlier this week, Dominion Resources, the utility serving the region, gets only 1 percent of its generation capacity from sources Greenpeace considers renewable and 2 percent from hydroelectric plants. The rest of the utility’s capacity is split about equally between coal, nuclear, and natural gas.

    See also: Cloud Fuels Unprecedented Data Center Boom in Northern Virginia

    The Green Cloud Conundrum

    This is why Northern Virginia – like other hot US data center markets, such as Chicago and to a lesser extent New Jersey – presents a conundrum for cloud and data center companies. Business considerations like proximity to fiber infrastructure and a critical mass of interconnection partners are at odds with corporate sustainability goals.

    Many internet giants have commitments to power 100 percent of their operations with renewable energy. Amazon Web Services made such a commitment in late 2014. As it continues expanding data center capacity around the world – and especially in Northern Virginia, which is already home to its biggest cloud region – Greenpeace is questioning its ability to deliver on that commitment in a way that will make a big-enough dent in carbon emissions the company is responsible for.

    See also: Switch Gets All As, Four Providers Fail Green Data Center Test

    More often than not, the best place to build a data center is not the best place to build a wind farm or a photovoltaic plant. The most popular answer to this conundrum among hyperscale internet companies has been decoupling Renewable Energy Credits from energy generated by a renewable plant in one place and applying them to compensate for dirty energy consumed by a data center in another. In Greenpeace’s point of view, however, this approach does not offer a sufficient-enough impact, since the data center is still generating energy demand on a grid powered by dirty energy.

    “You can’t pretend like doing one-off (renewable energy) deals in the middle of the country should count for operations in South Carolina or Georgia, where those electrons never meet,” Gary Cook, Greenpeace’s senior corporate campaigner and the new report’s lead author, said in an interview with Data Center Knowledge, referring to big wind and solar deals several internet and data center companies have made to meet their sustainability goals.

    Read more: Cleaning Up Data Center Power is Dirty Work

    The greatest impact is achieved when renewable energy is consumed on the same grid it is generated on, and both Amazon and Microsoft have succeeded in helping to bring more renewable generation capacity online in Virginia, where their cloud data centers can use it. Amazon has signed Power Purchase Agreements for wind and solar in the state, and Microsoft has struck a deal where it will help finance a 20MW solar project in return for RECs it will generate.

    Greenpeace commended both companies for taking these steps but pointed out that both cloud giants continue dramatically increasing demand on the grid in Northern Virginia, where (like in many other markets around the country) the ultimate problem is that renewable energy options are limited. “These efforts further underscore the need for both better options for customers to buy renewable energy and a greater willingness on behalf of companies to ensure such deals are designed to have a greater impact,” Greenpeace said in its new report.

    Easier Said than Done

    In addition to weather, one of the biggest obstacles to buying renewable energy on the same grid as your data center is the way many energy markets are structured and operated. Existing rate structure, regulations, and the need to balance supply and demand on the grid make bringing additional generation capacity online extremely complicated. Recently, there have been examples of hyperscale data center operators getting around this obstacle, however, and one of them is Amazon, in Virginia. Last year, the company negotiated an arrangement with Dominion and local regulators whereby it will essentially buy energy from its wind and solar projects on the same section of the grid at rates close to wholesale market rates rather than the uniform retail rates the utility charges all its customers.

    In an emailed statement, an AWS spokesperson pointed to the company’s renewable-energy commitment and progress it has made to date: “By April 2015 we hit 25 percent renewable, closed 2016 at 45 percent renewable, and have set a goal to reach 50 percent by the end of 2017.”

    By signing large-scale power purchase agreements, AWS has enabled 10 renewable energy projects in the US, which it expects to generate a total of 2.6 million MWh annually “onto the electric grid powering AWS data centers,” the statement read. Four of the 10 projects are already online.

    Dominion plans to extend the special rate it created for Amazon to other clean energy buyers in its territory up to 200MW, a move Greenpeace called an improvement but added that the biggest impact would be achieved by opening the market to energy providers other than Dominion. That would allow developers to sell 100 percent renewable energy directly to customers. While allowed under state law, Dominion and other utilities have aggressively fought attempts to make such changes, which would effectively disrupt their monopolies, according to Greenpeace.

    And that’s the reason Greenpeace considers advocacy one of the most important parts of companies’ efforts to operate on clean power. A lot needs to be changed about the way energy markets operate today in order to truly build an internet powered by renewable energy, and as big customers utilities love to serve, data center operators are in a strong position to negotiate for those changes.

    Additional reading: How Renewable Energy is Changing the Data Center Market

    5:07p
    Ex-Autonomy CFO Pleads Not Guilty in Case Over HP Buyout

    (Bloomberg) — Autonomy Corp.’s former chief financial officer pleaded not guilty to charges he schemed to inflate the price of his company’s $11 billion takeover by Hewlett-Packard Co. as the U.S. continues its investigation.

    After Sushovan Hussain entered his plea Thursday, the San Francisco federal judge overseeing the case said he wants to move toward a trial without delay. The executive traveled voluntarily from England for Thursday’s hearing and his lawyer has said he’s eager to prove his innocence.

    Prosecutors charged Hussain in November, five years after Hewlett-Packard admitted that its 2011 acquisition of Autonomy was a bust. He and Autonomy co-founder Michael Lynch face a lawsuit by Hewlett-Packard in a London court seeking $5.1 billion over allegations they made false claims about Autonomy’s performance and financial condition to boost the company’s value. Lynch wasn’t charged in the December indictment.

    Prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday that they’re still investigating other unidentified people in the case. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said Thursday he won’t allow the continuing probe to delay Hussain’s case and ordered lawyers to return to court May 10 to set a trial date.

    “I don’t intend that aspect to delay this aspect of it,” Breyer said. The judge, who handled a shareholder lawsuit over related issues that settled in 2015, said the legal fallout from the merger has taken unexpected twists. “It goes in directions that I’m not sure I would’ve anticipated.”

    Tim Crudo, a former federal prosecutor turned defense lawyer, said Hussain’s not guilty plea was expected. Any deal he might have worked out to cooperate with the government and testify against Lynch would have required a guilty plea and probably would have been negotiated before he was indicted, Crudo said.

    ‘Scrubbing This’

    “The government has been scrubbing this thing for a long time,” Crudo said. “I’m sure there have been discussions. Had they been able to work out a deal, they would’ve done it.”

    Crudo said prosecutors probably had to reach an agreement with Hussain for him to waive a deadline for bringing charges within five years of the alleged offense. Unless the government can allege that some conduct occurred within that time period, it would be hard-pressed to pursue a case against Lynch and other Autonomy executives unless they, too, have privately consented that it’s not too late to prosecute them under the statute of limitations, he said.

    Hussain’s lawyer, John Keker, declined to comment after Thursday’s hearing. He previously said it was a “shame” the U.S. Justice Department was doing Hewlett-Packard’s bidding by charging him. Keker told the judge in December he expected the case against Hussain to go to trial.

    Assistant U.S. attorneys Robert S. Leach and Adam A. Reeves also declined to comment after the hearing.

    After he was indicted, Hussain agreed to post bail of $1,000 and has been allowed to stay at home in England and travel so long as he doesn’t visit a country that doesn’t have an extradition treaty with the U.S.

    Hussain is still working with Lynch, who runs a Europe-focused $1 billion venture capital firm, Invoke Capital, that invests in tech startups and also helps set up and manage them.

    Insufficient Evidence

    The U.K.’s Serious Fraud Office has said there was insufficient evidence for a prosecution of Autonomy officials. In the U.S., Christopher Egan, the former chief executive officer of Autonomy’s U.S.-based subsidiary in San Francisco, agreed in November to pay $923,000 to settle an administrative proceeding in which the Securities and Exchange Commission accused him of participating in an accounting scheme. Egan, who left the company in November 2012, didn’t admit or deny the regulator’s findings.

    Hewlett-Packard’s acquisition of Autonomy came before a split of the company in 2015 that created Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., which focuses on technology for data centers, and HP Inc., which sells computers and printers.

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise has since been looking to shed other assets. The company last year announced it was spinning off and merging some non-core software assets in a multibillion-dollar deal with U.K.-based Micro Focus International Plc. As part of that deal, Micro Focus will be picking up pieces of Autonomy.

    This case is U.S. v. Hussain, 16-cr-00462, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

    6:58p
    Encryption, Authentication, and Yeah, Alligators: Here’s How Google Secures Its Cloud

    If you want to infiltrate a Google data center, you’ll have to think of ways to go around laser intrusion systems, biometric identification, good old security cameras, and, in at least one case, alligators. If physical data center intrusion is not your thing, hacking your way into the massive cloud may be a lot harder.

    From custom Google-designed security chips on every server to a never-off-the-clock investigation and incident response team, data center security measures are built into every single layer of the system.

    The company recently published a whitepaper describing its approach to security, more likely than not to strengthen the cloud-services marketing message to enterprises. The paper includes a section on securing the Google Cloud Platform.

    Nevertheless, it’s an interesting look at the way Google thinks about data center security.

    One service running on the infrastructure, for example, never assumes another service is legitimate. Services go through cryptographic authentication and authorization before they communicate.

    “The infrastructure does not assume any trust between services running on the infrastructure. In other words, the infrastructure is fundamentally designed to be multi-tenant,” the paper reads.

    Each individual service is configured to allow access only to specific Google engineers.

    Every machine, every service, and every engineer is given an individual identity, and all these identities are kept in a global name space maintained by the infrastructure, which has a sophisticated identity management workflow system. “This system allows secure access management processes to scale to the thousands of services running on the infrastructure.”

    Application-layer protocols are encapsulated inside the same security mechanisms as infrastructure-layer communication, which ensures that even if someone manages to hack into a data center network, there is an additional layer of encryption. Essentially, security of data flowing through the network is decoupled from security of the network itself.

    As Google has said in the past, all data traveling on the company’s private WAN that connects its data centers is automatically encrypted by default.

    Today, engineers can select whether or not to encrypt infrastructure-layer traffic inside its data centers (they may choose not to protect some low-risk traffic in return for better performance), but Google has started deploying hardware cryptographic accelerators that will eventually allow it to encrypt all traffic inside its data centers by default.

    More details on Google data center security in the paper itself.

    7:49p
    Report: IBM in Talks About Takeover of Lloyds Data Centers

    Lloyds Banking Group is in talks with IBM about potentially selling its data centers to the US company and having it run them as a service provider to the British financial services giant, The Register reported, citing anonymous sources.

    The move is seen as a potential way to raise cash and get some expensive assets off the balance sheet rather than a way to improve services for Lloyds, which has been undergoing massive restructuring, laying off back-office and IT workers and shutting down branches.

    The company’s data centers are in Copley, Pudsey, Peterborough, and Corby, according to The Register.

    The sale and outsourcing talks are reportedly led by Lloyds’ CIO, Jacqueline Guichelaar, who in her previous role as head of transformation at Deutsche Bank oversaw signing of a huge infrastructure operations outsourcing contract with HP.

    Lloyds’ technical infrastructure has been troubled by outages this week. Its website went down Wednesday and some customers couldn’t get access on Thursday. More downtime occurred Friday.

    << Previous Day 2017/01/13
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

Data Center Knowledge | News and analysis for the data center industry - Industry News and Analysis About Data Centers   About LJ.Rossia.org