LWN.net's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Tuesday, June 28th, 2016

    Time Event
    4:09p
    Tuesday's security advisories

    Debian has updated kernel (multiple vulnerabilities).

    Debian-LTS has updated movabletype-opensource (SQL injection) and spice (information disclosure).

    Fedora has updated drupal7 (F23; F22: privilege escalation), gd (F24: three vulnerabilities), krb5 (F24: buffer overflow), nodejs (F24: unspecified), and phpMyAdmin (F24: multiple vulnerabilities).

    Gentoo has updated icedtea-bin (multiple vulnerabilities) and kwalletd (misuse of crypto).

    openSUSE has updated rsync (13.2: unsafe destination path).

    SUSE has updated firefox, nss, nspr (SLE12-SP1: multiple vulnerabilities) and kernel (SLE12-SP1; SLE12: multiple vulnerabilities).

    Ubuntu has updated kernel (16.04; 15.10; 14.04; 12.04: multiple vulnerabilities), linux-lts-trusty (12.04: multiple vulnerabilities), linux-lts-utopic (14.04: multiple vulnerabilities), linux-lts-vivid (14.04: multiple vulnerabilities), linux-lts-wily (14.04: multiple vulnerabilities), linux-lts-xenial (14.04: multiple vulnerabilities), linux-raspi2 (16.04; 15.10: multiple vulnerabilities), linux-snapdragon (16.04: multiple vulnerabilities), and linux-ti-omap4 (12.04: multiple vulnerabilities).

    8:29p
    GitHub's 2015 Transparency Report
    GitHub has published
    its 2015 transparency report. "This 2015 report details the types of
    requests we receive for user accounts, user content, information about our
    users, and other such information, and how we process those
    requests. Transparency and trust are essential to GitHub and to the open
    source community, and giving you access to information about these requests
    can protect you, protect us, and help you feel safe as you work on
    GitHub.
    " The report notes that a significant number of requests for
    removal of content are notices submitted under the Digital Millennium
    Copyright Act, or the DMCA.
    10:37p
    [$] How many -stable patches introduce new bugs?
    The -stable kernel release process faces a contradictory set of constraints.
    Developers naturally want to get as many fixes into -stable as possible
    but, at the same time, there is a strong desire to avoid introducing new
    regressions there. Each -stable release is, after all, intended to be more
    stable than its predecessor. At times there have been complaints that
    -stable is too accepting and too prone to regressions, but not many
    specifics. But, it turns out, this is an area where at least a little bit
    of objective research can be done.

    << Previous Day 2016/06/28
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

LWN.net   About LJ.Rossia.org