MIT Research News' Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Monday, May 8th, 2017

    Time Event
    11:00a
    High-temperature devices made from films that bend as they “breathe”

    Carrying out maintenance tasks inside a nuclear plant puts severe strains on equipment, due to extreme temperatures that are hard for components to endure without degrading. Now, researchers at MIT and elsewhere have come up with a radically new way to make actuators that could be used in such extremely hot environments.

    The system relies on oxide materials similar to those used in many of today’s rechargeable batteries, in that ions move in and out of the material during charging and discharging cycles. Whether the ions are lithium ions, in the case of lithium ion batteries, or oxygen ions, in the case of the oxide materials, their reversible motion causes the material to expand and contract.

    Such expansion and contraction can be a major issue affecting the usable lifetime of a battery or fuel cell, as the repeated changes in volume can cause cracks to form, potentially leading to short-circuits or degraded performance. But for high-temperature actuators, these volume changes are a desired result rather than an unwelcome side effect.

    The findings are described in a report appearing this week in the journal Nature Materials, by Jessica Swallow, an MIT graduate student; Krystyn Van Vliet, the Michael (1949) and Sonja Koerner Professor of Materials Science and Engineering; Harry Tuller, professor of materials science and engineering; and five others.

    “The most interesting thing about these materials is that they function at temperatures above 500 degrees Celsius,” Swallow explains. That suggests that their predictable bending motions could be harnessed, for example, for maintenance robotics inside a nuclear reactor, or actuators inside jet engines or spacecraft engines.

    By coupling these oxide materials with other materials whose dimensions remain constant, it is possible to make actuators that bend when the oxide expands or contracts. This action is similar to the way bimetallic strips work in thermostats, where heating causes one metal to expand more than another that is bonded to it, leading the bonded strip to bend. For these tests, the researchers used a compound dubbed PCO, for praseodymium-doped cerium oxide.

    Conventional materials used to create motion by applying electricity, such as piezoelectric devices, don’t work nearly as well at such high temperatures, so the new system could open up a new area of high-temperature sensors and actuators. Such devices could be used, for example, to open and close valves in these hot environments, the researchers say.

    Van Vliet says the finding was made possible as a result of a high-resolution, probe-based mechanical measurement system for high-temperature conditions that she and her co-workers have developed over the years. The system provides “precision measurements of material motion that here relate directly to oxygen levels,” she says, enabling researchers to measure exactly how the oxygen is cycling in and out of the metal oxide.

    To make these measurements, scientists begin by depositing a thin layer of metal oxide on a substrate, then use the detection system, which can measure small displacements on a scale of nanometers, or billionths of a meter. “These materials are special,” she says, “because they ‘breathe’ oxygen in and out, and change volume, and that causes the substrate to bend.”

    While they demonstrated the process using one particular oxide compound, the researchers say the findings could apply broadly to a variety of oxide materials, and even to other kinds of ions in addition to oxygen, moving in and out of the oxide layer.

    These findings “are highly significant, since they demonstrate and explain the chemical expansion of thin films at high temperatures,” says Holger Fritze, a professor at the

    Clausthal University of Technology in Germany, who was not involved in this work. “Such systems show large strain in comparison to other high-temperature stable materials, thereby enabling new applications including high-temperature actuators,” he says.

    “The approach used here is very novel,” says Brian Sheldon, a professor of engineering at Brown University, who also was not involved in this research. “As the authors have pointed out, this approach can provide information that differs from that obtained with other methods that are employed to investigate chemical expansion.”

    This work has two important features, Sheldon says: It provides important basic information about the chemical expansion of such materials, and it opens the possibility of new kinds of high-temperature actuators. “I think that both are very important accomplishments,” he says.

    The research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Basic Energy Science Small Research Grants Program and used shared facilities provided by the National Science Foundation’s MRSEC Program.

    2:20p
    An ear for political language

    When Tony Blair won a landslide victory in 1997, ending 18 years of Conservative Party rule in Britain, Tom O’Grady celebrated. “I was watching TV and cheering on my sofa at 1 a.m.,” he recalls.

    Given his fervor for politics, and the fact that he was nurtured by an “extremely liberal family frequently discussing poverty and public services,” O’Grady says it’s hardly surprising that today he is completing a doctorate in political science at MIT. Or that the subject of his dissertation is the evolution of anti-welfare policies in the UK.

    The son of parents employed by the National Health Service, O’Grady engaged in formal and informal political activism as a student. He took a gap year after secondary school to do volunteer work with street youth in Ecuador. As a college student at the University of Edinburgh, he headed up the student Labour Party. He thought he fancied a life in elective politics — until his college internship with a member of Parliament (MP) in Scotland.

    “One day a week I’d put my suit on, go to his office and write letters to constituents,” he says. “I found that kind of job didn’t suit me because individual MPs can’t effect much change, and I wanted the chance to shape policy.”

    In search of such an opportunity, O’Grady earned a master’s degree in economics from University College London, and then worked as a researcher forecasting inflation for the Bank of England. Finally, as a PhD candidate at MIT, he found a question compelling enough to drive years of research.

    “I wanted to know why, over the past 30 years or so, there was increasing hostility against the welfare state in the UK, not just among rich people, but also among the very poorest,” he says.

    O’Grady first examined polling data to document the decline of support in public opinion for welfare. Then, he says: “I decided to examine the discourse of politicians, measuring what they said about welfare in a rigorous way, to see if what they said had an impact on public opinion.”

    This was no simple task. O’Grady downloaded transcripts of speeches in the House of Commons from 1987 to 2015. He wrote software programs in Python, and crafted machine learning tools that could identify relevant phrases and words in speeches such as “welfare reform,” “lazy people,” “people should be working,” and “scroungers.”

    O’Grady discovered a dramatic increase in the frequency of these clusters starting in the 1990s. “There was a really dramatic turnaround in rhetoric about welfare, particularly from the British Labour Party,” he says. “In the late 1980s, MPs were talking about the desperate need to provide welfare so people could live, and welfare as a right, and over time, welfare became something that trapped people in unemployment, made them lazy, and encouraged fraud.”

    This shift in rhetoric was spurred in part by Tony Blair’s goal of making the Labour Party more electable by adopting more centrist positions. O'Grady also believes the change of parliamentary tone was also the result of a steep decline in the number of MPs drawn from the working class.

    “This was due to institutional change, including the collapse of the trade union movement in the UK, which had historically sponsored the political careers of coal miners and other working class tradespeople,” says O’Grady. “Also, political campaigning became more professionalized and expensive, meaning that it was difficult for those outside of the middle class to stand for office.”

    O’Grady’s analysis of changes in political rhetoric does not just demonstrate that “working class MPs speak differently from middle class MPs,” but also that “voters are influenced by politicians, and public opinion began to turn only after the rhetoric of politicians shifted.”

    The impact of this shift is readily apparent today, he says. “Welfare assistance has been cut quite dramatically in the past 30 years, and the public is now hugely turned against it, even working class voters who might serve to benefit.” Popular opinion, even among those at the lowest levels of income distribution, is that “benefits turn people against working, and while you may yourself receive welfare, others who receive it are behaving badly,” he says.

    O'Grady acknowledges that dislodging the stigma against helping people in poverty may take decades. After he returns to England in August to become an assistant professor of political science at University College London, O’Grady says he hopes to push back against the dominant discourse.

    “There’s a counter-narrative people should hear, that welfare is something we might all need at some point in our lives, a necessary insurance against adverse events that helps people get back on their feet after they’re down,” he says. “Influencing the public as a policy expert is a challenging task, one that involves doing a good job getting across the facts, but it’s a conversation I would like to start.”

    << Previous Day 2017/05/08
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

MIT Research News   About LJ.Rossia.org