Philosophical problem from use of programs that compose writing
The use of programs that compose articles based on machine learning
poses philosophical problems for education in writing.
Here's an idea: if these systems tend to be led by their training
towards expressing the usual points of view, assign to a student the
task of arguing for an unusual point of view, whether perse really
believes it or not.
The idea that there is no point in learning to write well if a program
can do that for you is misguided. A calculator, or various programs
such as dc or Emacs, can do arithmetic for you, but you need to learn
how to add and multiply or you you won't understand those operations
fully. Once you know how, you can use a program to actually do it.