Richard Stallman's Political Notes' Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Saturday, September 2nd, 2023

    Time Event
    12:31p
    Political assassins: impunity a norm

    *Former member of Belarus "hit squad" to stand trial over disappearances [presumed ordered by Lukashenko].*

    12:31p
    LGBTQ US travel advisory, CAN

    *Canada issues travel advisory for LGBTQ+ residents visiting US.*

    12:31p
    Killing fin whales, ISL

    *Iceland allows whaling to resume in "massive step backwards".*

    12:31p
    Gov. consultancy firms scandals, AUS

    *[Large global] consultancy firm used "power maps" of Australian officials to help win government contracts.*

    12:31p
    Urgent: reconfirm Gwynne Wilcox, NLRB

    US citizens: phone your senators to call on them to reconfirm Gwynne Wilcox to another term on the National Labor Relations Board. Republicans are trying to block her reappointment so that the board will not have quorum and will be unable to do its vital work.

    Please call as soon as possible — her reconfirmation will be voted on next week.

    I saw an online messaging campaign for this, but sending a message to a member of Congress does not allow ordinary email. It requires using a web form that demands execution of nonfree JavaScript code. For moral reasons I do not use that form, or recommend it to the public.

    See https://gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html and https://gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html.

    It is a grave wrong for any government activity to require the public to run nonfree software co communicate with it.

    I discovered this problem several years ago, and since then have always asked people to use phone calls to communicate with members of Congress. But I don't recall that I explained the reason before.

    The Capitol Switchboard numbers are +1-202-224-3121, +1-888-818-6641 and +1-888-355-3588.

    If you phone, please spread the word!

    12:31p
    Labour courting big business

    *When a British politician discusses “tough choices”, [person] invariably [reveals] whose side [perse is] really on. A tough choice tends to involve emptying the pockets of those with little, or slashing a service ordinary citizens depend on.*

    In any country, the plutocratist politicians are the ones that do this. Labour's string of "tough choices" shows it has become a plutocratist party. The Tories, formerly the reasonable-sounding plutocratist party, has become the incompetent nutso party, and Starmer has moved Labour into the Tories' old spot. Now Labour is competing with the Tories for breaking promises to correct horrible problems. The most recent Labour pledge to be dropped is the wealth tax.

    In the US, plutocratist politicians since Reagan have allowed dooH niboR to transfer ever more of the working people's previous share of national income to the rich. Progressive proposals to return some of that to the non-rich always provoke squeals of exaggerated pain from the rich, claiming that that would be unfair and intolerable. The politicians who heed them do so because they are plutocratist. Clinton, the first plutocratist Democratic president since a century ago, continued on that path, and so did Dubya and Obama.

    Biden has made efforts to help the non-rich. I expected another Obama but I was favorably surprised. He would have done more but plutocratists in Congress (including some Democrats) blocked him.

    *Biden says white supremacy has no place in US after Florida killings.* That shows some moral leadership.

    Nonetheless, he is no Bernie Sanders.

    However, one difference between political parties in the US and political parties in Britain is that a US party does not have veto power over candidates for federal office. The voters choose them. That is why we see increasing numbers of progressive Democrats elected to Congress. We can, by supporting them, convert the Democratic Party step by step into a progressive party again.

    Britons can't do that any more in the Labour Party. Starmer's strict measures to exclude non-plutocratists from running as Labour candidates block that completely, so there is no hope down the Labour path any more.

    Compare today's Labour leadership with the leaders that set up the National Health Service and made it work. What a shame.

    12:46p
    Labour courting big business

    *When a British politician discusses “tough choices”, [person] invariably [reveals] whose side [perse is] really on. A tough choice tends to involve emptying the pockets of those with little, or slashing a service ordinary citizens depend on.*

    In any country, the plutocratist politicians are the ones that do this. Labour's string of "tough choices" shows it has become a plutocratist party. The Tories, formerly the reasonable-sounding plutocratist party, has become the incompetent nutso party, and Starmer has moved Labour into the Tories' old spot. Now Labour is competing with the Tories for breaking promises to correct horrible problems. The most recent Labour pledge to be dropped is the wealth tax.

    In the US, plutocratist politicians since Reagan have allowed dooH niboR to transfer ever more of the working people's previous share of national income to the rich. Progressive proposals to return some of that to the non-rich always provoke squeals of exaggerated pain from the rich, claiming that that would be unfair and intolerable. The politicians who heed them do so because they are plutocratist. Clinton, the first plutocratist Democratic president since a century ago, continued on that path, and so did Dubya and Obama.

    Biden has made efforts to help the non-rich. I expected another Obama but I was favorably surprised. He would have done more but plutocratists in Congress (including some Democrats) blocked him.

    *Biden says white supremacy has no place in US after Florida killings.* That shows some moral leadership.

    Nonetheless, he is no Bernie Sanders.

    However, one difference between political parties in the US and political parties in Britain is that a US party does not have veto power over candidates for federal office. The voters choose them. That is why we see increasing numbers of progressive Democrats elected to Congress. We can, by supporting them, convert the Democratic Party step by step into a progressive party again.

    Britons can't do that any more in the Labour Party. Starmer's strict measures to exclude non-plutocratists from running as Labour candidates block that completely, so there is no hope down the Labour path any more.

    Compare today's Labour leadership with the leaders that set up the National Health Service and made it work. What a shame.

    << Previous Day 2023/09/02
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

Richard Stallman's Political Notes   About LJ.Rossia.org