Richard Stallman's Political Notes' Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Thursday, March 14th, 2024

    Time Event
    5:21a
    A DAFfed democracy, US

    *New Report from the Institute for Policy Studies Reveals the True Cost of Billionaire Philanthropy.*

    5:21a
    Loser grasping at hate-straws

    *[The blackwhiter] flip flops on TikTok.* Whatever Biden is for, the blackwhiter opposes.

    5:21a
    Urgent: Asset managers of fossil fuels

    US citizens: call on the CEOs of BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street to keep fossil fuels in the ground.

    12:51p
    The death penalty in the US

    Now that some US states are using, or may use, nitrogen gas for executions, there is a campaign to block that method by restricting what the buyers of medical nitrogen can use it for.

    As one who opposes the death penalty on principle, regardless of the method used, I am always puzzled by the fuss that people make about those details. I'm especially puzzled by the question of whether the person being executed feels pain during the process. Does it presume that temporary pain is worse than death?

    Imagine that you are in Gaza and you are wounded. You may be lucky enough to find a surgeon but there will be no anesthetic available. Would you say, "Please don't operate, just kill me"? You might, I might — but if you have the fortitude to handle days of pain after surgery, you'd say, "Operate! I will suffer so I can live."

    So I don't see how a painless method of execution can make execution legitimate.

    Meanwhile, it is dangerous and unjust to allow the sellers of products any say in how purchasers use them. That power is very broad and lends itself to injustice.

    Few of the purchasers of any product want to use it for executions. What if you buy something so as to use it for something innocent, such as copying DVDs or Blu-ray disks? Should the seller be allowed to forbid you to use it that way? We must not allow companies to have such power over their customers! We must defeat any law that would give a company that kind of power.

    What, then, about using nitrogen for execution? If we are opposed to the death penalty, and we have the political support to put a stop to it, we should refuse to get distracted by the side issue of giving producers of nitrogen the power to control what purchasers will do with it, refuse to get distracted from this by the idea of blocking some methods of execution (but not all) in this way.

    Instead we should use that political support to prohibit the death penalty. We could insist that purchasers of nitrogen be free to use it for any lawful activity, which would no longer include executions.

    12:51p
    Nuclear weapon temptations within Iran

    Concern that some factions in Iran want nuclear weapons.

    But there is nothing we can do to discourage that, not any more. The wrecker's aggression destroyed the non-nuclear deal and made it impossible to restart.

    12:51p
    Paying to play poorly with public, NYC

    New York Governor Hochul gets funds from big investors in Manhattan real estate, and modified a public records law to let them continue to conceal their identities from the public.

    << Previous Day 2024/03/14
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

Richard Stallman's Political Notes   About LJ.Rossia.org