Richard Stallman's Political Notes' Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Friday, March 22nd, 2024

    Time Event
    7:22a
    Devon politics

    Some districts in the UK are experimenting with an unofficial primary election which helps the voters figure out which opposition party they support has the best chance of defeating the incumbent party.

    This is not part of the official electoral system, but helps voters determine how to vote tactically in the official election.

    7:22a
    Arms sales to Israel

    Canada will halt arms sales to Israel, based on reproach in the legislature for Israel's disregard for the likes of Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

    7:22a
    Biden's big tech defeat

    Biden negotiated changes in NAFTA, weakening business power in the area of international digital business.

    7:22a
    Marañón River

    A court in Peru decided that the River Marañón has "intrinsic rights".

    In philosophical terms, that is absurd, because exercising rights requires volition, and the river is not capable of that.

    The practical content of the decision is good. To preserve the river's existence, ensure it continues to flow, restore damage, reduce pollution in it, and protect it's ecosystems are legitimate and important responsibilities — of humans, including the state.

    However, to call those goals "rights" of the river itself is absurd, because the river cannot think, want, or decide anything. It is not in fact capable of exercising rights.

    There is no need to base policies to protect nature on an incoherent philosophical foundation. We can establish a responsibility to protect rivers without asserting that they have rights.

    7:22a
    Kidnapping fears and stats

    Kidnapping of children is so rare in the US that parents who worry about it are giving themselves pointless grief.

    The article compares that risk with other risks children face.

    12:23p
    Urgent: ExxonMobile-enabled climate upheaval

    US citizens: Tell ExxonMobile: you caused the climate crisis — not us.

    When a few powerful entities — such as, major oil companies — reshape the system that most people live in so that only by making difficult efforts can they avoid putting the world in grave danger, those entities become responsible for the harm they have led and pressured people to do.

    12:23p
    Urgent: Support Schumer's rebuke to Netanyahu

    US citizens: Support Senator Schumer's rebuke to Netanyahu, and the pressure on Israel to stop the mass killing of Palestinian civilians.

    12:23p
    Urgent: Ships with renewable, not fracked, energy

    Everyone: call on Canada to power ships with renewable energy, not fracked methane.

    12:23p
    12:23p
    Minimum wage battle, Minneapolis

    Ride companies Guber and Lyft threaten to leave Minneapolis now that the city has voted to require them to pay at least minimum wage.

    The officials that voted to require paying drivers decent wage say that those exploitative and gouging companies are welcome to leave. May this start a world-wide movement to end such exploitation of workers.

    12:23p
    Greenland greening, glaciers receding

    *Climate experts sound alarm over thriving plant life at Greenland ice sheet.*

    12:23p
    Bill to tame LLM "releases", CA

    California is considering a bill that would require companies to test large "artificial intelligence" models for "unsafe" behavior before "releasing" them, and set up ways to shut them down completely.

    The best known large language models do not properly qualify as "intelligence", but I expect that the bill would define the term with the usual misguided usage. In terms of substance, that is the right decision: the bill would be useless for its purpose if it did not cover bullshit generators.

    The bill would apply to "released" programs. Bullshit generators are typically not released at all -- you can't get a copy of GPT4, not even an executable copy. They are made available for use only as SaaSS (Service as a Software Substitute):

    I expect that the author intends the law to apply to those systems, and it would be ineffective if it did not apply to them. That implies that the bill's sponsor, or perhaps the author of the article, is distorting the word "released" to include unreleased programs.

    This will cause further confusion. It is surely possible to write the law to have the intended meaning without spreading confusions about the meaning of words.

    There is a substantive issue, too. Will this law effectively prohibit the real release of free software to do machine learning? It could do that, depending on the precise wording.

    12:23p
    Millions of displaced Congolese, DRC

    *It's time to ask why the US and UK fund Rwanda while atrocities [it supports] mount up in DRC.*

    The western sponsors of Rwanda may be racists and they may enjoy seeing black Africans suffer. But I am skeptical that they join such a complex and selective scheme involving dividing groups of blacks against each other. I suspect that money is somehow at the root of that.

    << Previous Day 2024/03/22
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

Richard Stallman's Political Notes   About LJ.Rossia.org