Richard Stallman's Political Notes' Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Sunday, December 1st, 2024

    Time Event
    4:37a
    Arrests of climate protesters in Australia

    Hundreds of climate protesters have been arrested in Australia recently for disruptive but nonviolent protests against the fossil fuel juggernaut of death.

    </l>
    4:37a
    Putin continues his nuclear panic campaign

    Putin continues his nuclear panic campaign by firing an experimental hypersonic missile at Kyiv without a warhead. We are supposed to be terrified because, as Putin reminded us repeatedly, that model of missile could have been launched with a nuclear warhead (though it wasn't).

    The message Putin communicates this way is, "Be afraid! If I really were crazy, I might fire a nuclear weapon at you. Hey, aren't you afraid yet?"

    Hypersonic missiles have a practical advantage: that they are hard to intercept. Aside from that, they are not much different from an ordinary ballistic missile.

    </li>
    4:37a
    Banks trading highly leveraged assets

    Banks are finding ways to trade highly leveraged assets that cause a risk of global financial crash.

    The laws passed around 2009 to try to prevent this were not as strong as the depression-era Glass-Steagall law that was partly repealed in 1999. When bankers get powerful enough to repeal the protections meant to stop them from crashing society, it shows their corrupting influence has prevailed.

    </li>
    4:37a
    Big tech no friend to progressives

    The big tech companies have proved they are no friends of progressives, democracy, or civil liberties.

    </li>
    4:37a
    Rule on contested words and phrases

    The University of Sydney is considering a rule requiring speakers to "make the meaning of contested words and phrases clear to the audience."

    I can see a lot of vagueness in that rule. Does this apply to any word or phrase whose meaning someone contests at that moment? Or would there be a specific published list of words and phrases that must be made clear if and when used?

    </li>
    4:37a
    Warrant for Myanmar military leader

    *ICC prosecutor seeks arrest warrant for Myanmar military leader… for crimes against humanity over deportation and persecution of Rohingya minority.*

    </li>
    4:37a
    Wrecker's promise to loosen crypto regulations

    *[The wrecker's] promise to loosen crypto regulations may be boon for extremist groups* (such as his own).

    </li>
    4:37a
    Climate denial theme

    *Climate denial a unifying theme of [the world-wrecker's] cabinet picks, experts say.*

    </li>
    4:37a
    4:37a
    Saltwater in the Delaware river

    Drought and sea level rise are bringing salt water into the Delaware river, threatening to spoil the drinking water of millions.

    The drought may be due to global heating. The sea level rise certainly is.

    </li>
    4:37a
    Accused of firing on Imran Khan supporters

    *Pakistan army and police accused of firing on Imran Khan supporters.*

    I don't know enough about this situation to draw any conclusion about which side — if any — supports human rights and democracy. Both sides are using force, but the army is shooting and seems to be covering up the casualties.

    </li>
    4:37a
    Musk wants to eliminate CFPB

    Why would Musk care if the CFPB continues to protect Americans?

    He surely owns shares in some large US banks, and if the CFPB were eliminated, those banks would squeeze some additional billions out of their non-rich customer. Must would get some of that.

    But I doubt that is enough money to move Musk to have an opinion about the question. I think he must have some other kind of motive, more emotional than financial.

    I conjecture that he has come to hate people who advocate regulating businesses. That he wants to eliminate anything that could limit his power to make people obey.

    </li>
    4:37a
    Cease-fire between Hezbollah and Israel

    Biden has brought about a cease-fire between Hezbollah and Israel.

    Israel has achieved its war aims in Lebanon, which were simple: an end to attacks by Hezbollah in support of HAMAS. In effect, Hezbollah has accepted a substantial decrease in its power and territory, but has not lost anything really crucial. The Lebanese army is supposed to maintain control in southern Lebanon.

    The previous agreement, which Hezbollah broke in Oct 2023, likewise said that the Lebanese army was to maintain control in southern Lebanon and keep Hezbollah from dominating that territory. The Lebanese army unable to do that, as Hezbollah was stronger. Hezbollah is now weaker, so perhaps the agreement can establish peace. Or it might fall apart.

    This Lebanon agreement does nothing to prevent the killing of additional tens or hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza.

    </li>

    << Previous Day 2024/12/01
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

Richard Stallman's Political Notes   About LJ.Rossia.org