TorrentFreak's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View]

Wednesday, January 27th, 2021

    Time Event
    10:02a
    Pirate IPTV Providers Must Be Blocked By ISPs, French Court Rules

    IPTVIn common with their counterparts around Europe, rightsholders in France have regularly filed for injunctions to have pirate sites blocked by ISPs.

    Until recently, their work has been focused on traditional torrent, streaming, and other download platforms but the rise of pirate IPTV services has now prompted an expansion.

    Rightsholders Seek First-Ever IPTV Blocking Injunction

    In order to stem the tide of IPTV services offering live TV and on-demand content without the necessary licensing, French anti-piracy group ALPA teamed up with Ministry of Culture agency CNC (National Cinema Center), and a number of rightsholders to file for a blocking injunction at the Court of Paris.

    According to the applicants, IPTV-Teli, King365-TV, DDNC, IPTV Panel, Premium-IPTV, Prime Plus, Xtream and TVService-Pro, which are accessible via various domain gateways, allow Internet users to access live TV, catch-up services, and VOD platforms offering movies and TV shows. All are paid subscription services that access the market via a network of resellers.

    To disrupt their business activities, the rightsholders represented by ALPA summoned leading ISPs including Orange, Free, SFR Fiber, and Bouygues Telecom to appear before the Court for a hearing on November 23, 2020.

    The aim was to have them block access to pirate services at the following domains: iptv-teli.com, king365-tv.com, king365-tv.cf, king365tv.com, ddnc.us, platinumiptv.pro, premium-itv.com, primeplus.tv, xtream.ws, and tvservice.pro.

    Court Considers Nature Of The Allegedly Infringing Services

    ALPA Executive Officer Frédéric Delacroix informs TorrentFreak that the application was an action under Article L. 336-2 of the French Intellectual Property Code, which allows courts to order measures to prevent or disrupt copyright infringement taking place via an online communication service.

    “There was no dispute from ISPs,” Delacroix explains. “The case law in France that we have acquired is well established after more than thirty decisions concerning the blocking of nearly 340 sites corresponding to around 1,100 domain names.”

    The decision handed down on December 17, 2020, shows that the Court considered whether the pirate IPTV services did indeed breach the rights of the movie, TV, and broadcasting companies.

    An ALPA analysis found that IPTV-Teli offered 4,827 TV channels, 4,588 movies and 271 TV series while King365-TV offered 2,847 TV channels, 1,734 movies and 360 TV series, all without the necessary permission. Similar unlicensed offerings were also found at the other suppliers listed in the application.

    Delacroix informs TF that it is difficult to know precisely where the services operate from or how many users they have, since measuring IPTV consumption is more challenging than acquiring data on traditional pirate sites such as streaming, DDL and peer-to-peer portals. As a result, each found themselves targeted due to their popularity among consumers in the French market.

    First Pirate IPTV Blocking Injunction Issued in France

    In common with blocking applications heard elsewhere in Europe, the Court of Paris sought to balance the protection of intellectual property rights with the rights of Internet service providers and their customers, including the freedom to receive and communicate information. The Court ultimately determined that ISP blocking is warranted considering the overwhelmingly infringing nature of the IPTV services.

    The blocking injunction handed down by the Court requires the ISPs to block the domains listed above plus any related sub-domains. The ISPs were ordered to implement blocking within 15 days for a period of 18 months.

    All costs of blocking are to be borne by the Internet service providers and should the targeted IPTV services implement circumvention measures, the applicants will have the right to apply for additional blocking under an accelerated process.

    “The immediate effect of these actions is that users haven’t been able to connect to their services, generally paid in advance,” Delacroix says.

    “ALPA will continue these types of actions against other illegal IPTV services.”

    The decision of the Court of Paris can be found here (pdf)

    From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

    8:56p
    Research Shows that Shorter Movie Release Windows Boost Revenue, Not Piracy

    korsubAfter a film premieres at the box office, movie fans typically have to wait a few months before they can see it online, depending on the local release strategy.

    This delay tactic, known as a release window, helps movie theaters to maximize their revenues. However, for many pirates, this is also a reason to turn to unauthorized sites and services.

    Shrinking Release Windows

    In recent years these release windows have slowly decreased and this process was accelerated in the COVID pandemic. Increasingly, traditional delays have come down, and in some cases, release windows have disappeared completely. Warner Bros, for example, now releases movies on HBO Max and in theaters simultaneously.

    This shift is nothing short of a historic breakthrough. While more choice is good for consumers, these changes also breed uncertainty. Some movie industry insiders and theater owners, for example, fear that their income will be negatively impacted. At the same time, there are concerns that piracy will spike.

    These and other questions are addressed in new research conducted by Carnegie Mellon’s Initiative for Digital Entertainment Analytics (IDEA). The research group, which received millions of dollars in gifts from the Motion Picture Association, just analyzed how early releases affect piracy and box office revenue.

    Impact on Box Office and Piracy

    The results are published in a non-peer-reviewed paper titled The Impact of Early Digital Movie Releases on Box Office Revenue: Evidence from the Korean Market.

    As the title suggests, the research focuses on the Korean movie market which is the fourth-largest in the world, following the US, China, and Japan. In recent years movie studios have experimented with release windows in korea, which are significantly shorter than in other countries, including the US.

    Instead of waiting three months, Korean “Super Premium” digital releases typically come out a month after the theatrical release. This means that movies are available while they are still playing in theaters.

    The researchers use this unique situation to compare various movie revenue streams, as well as piracy figures, with the United States. To get the full picture, they also add in the effect of early versus regular digital releases in Korea itself.

    Box Office Revenue is Unaffected

    Following a complex statistical analysis, the researchers can estimate the effect of the early “Super Premium” releases on Korean box office revenue. They find a small negative effect of less than 1%, which isn’t statistically significant.

    “We find a statistically and economically insignificant decline in theatrical revenue due to the early SP release, equivalent to an approximate 0.8% drop in total theatrical revenue in Korea during the first eight weeks of the theatrical run,” the researchers conclude.

    This is an important finding as it shows that releasing a digital copy of movie months in advance doesn’t hurt theater revenues. This suggests that both consumption channels are complementary, which is great news for movie studios.

    More Revenue for Movie Studios

    And indeed, the researchers find that “Super Premium” video on demand (SPVOD) releases boost studio revenue by roughly 12% during the first weeks.

    “Using digital movie sales data in Korea and industry estimates of studio margins on theatrical and SPVOD revenue, we estimate that SPVOD releases increase the marginal revenue received by studios in the first eight weeks of a movie’s Korean release by approximately 12%.”

    While this all sounds positive, it’s undeniable that these early releases also impact piracy. This is confirmed by the data which show that the “pirate” release windows are also decreasing. Not just in Korea, but globally too.

    No Boost in Piracy Figures

    According to the researchers, however, this isn’t much of a problem. People will download pirated copies earlier, but the data don’t show that the piracy volume in Korea or the US increases for these movie titles. Pirates just get to download a film sooner.

    “Finally, while the data from torrent piracy suggest that early SPVOD releases lead to earlier global availability of high-quality piracy sources, we see no evidence that these early sources increase piracy demand for movies released in SPVOD windows in either the Korean or US markets.”

    All in all, the findings show that the movie industry is on the right track by shortening release windows. It’s not just good for consumers but also increases studios’ income too.

    More Research Needed

    That said, it’s far too early to generalize. This study looked at a very specific set of movies for which the “Super Premium” release came out after 28 days. It could very well be that longer, shorter, or no delays will have a different impact.

    This shortcoming is recognized by the researchers who also stress that more research into the effects on piracy is needed. Especially in cases where a movie is released in one country before it’s available somewhere else.

    But with more and more release experiments taking place, we expect that follow-up studies are already underway.

    From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

    << Previous Day 2021/01/27
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

TorrentFreak   About LJ.Rossia.org