Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет Misha Verbitsky ([info]tiphareth)
@ 2012-11-28 01:25:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
сообщение для связи
Для связи. Комменты скринятся.

Архивы:
[ 2011 | 2007-2010 | 2006 ]


(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


[info]twenty
2012-06-14 16:37 (ссылка)
Perhaps the most remarkable thing about the self-archiving model is the contrast between its enthusiastic uptake by physicists and the general indifference of the biology community. Although some physicists may attribute this to biologists' secretive and competitive personalities, it seems implausible that these traits are either unique to or universal among biologists. In fact, ArXiv does contain a few biology preprints, particularly in neuroscience. Most are from a relatively small number of theoretically oriented researchers, particularly those with physics backgrounds. This suggests that cultural habits may be more significant than any deep psychological explanation. Moreover, biologists seem unconcerned about announcing their conclusions online; the Society for Neuroscience website, for example, carries over 13,000 abstracts from last year's meeting alone. Adding data to substantiate the conclusions would seem like a relatively modest step.

One key concern for many researchers is academic credit, and the fear of being plagiarized or scooped is probably the main reason more biologists do not participate. Yet this makes little sense. Whereas it may be difficult to show that a competitor secretly photographed one's poster during a meeting, an archived preprint represents a clear documented claim, and digital searching should make it easy to demonstrate priority and to spot plagiarism when it occurs.

The other major deterrent to self-archiving is the policy of some journals. Science, for example, is explicit in its prohibition: "Posting of a paper on the Internet may be considered prior publication that could compromise the originality of the Science submission. Thus, if you are planning to submit your paper to Science, it should not be posted online."


был nature precedings, да сплыл

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Читать комментарии) -