[Recent Entries][Archive][Friends][User Info]
October 3rd, 2018
| October 3rd, 2018 | |
|---|---|
| 01:01 pm [Link] |
grievance studies Прекрасно https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/aca https://www.wsj.com/articles/fake-n Граждане изучили феминистские и антирасистские науки (gender studies, women studie, gay and lesbian studies) и обнаружили, что в этих науках можно опубликовать любую белиберду, даже в самых лучших журналах, если хорошо освоить жаргон и логику дискурса; чем бредовее, тем лучше. Опубликовали их чуть более чем дохуя. Вот, например, статья Human reactions to rape culture and queer performativity at urban dog parks in Portland, Oregon Keywords: Animaling, Black feminist criminology, dog park, feminist geography, queer geography, rape culture https://lockerroom.johnlocke.org/2018/0 https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/4564 https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/0 https://www.pluralist.com/posts/1607-fe https://www.dailywire.com/news/33593/pe https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11158 https://pjmedia.com/trending/doctor-o This article addresses questions in human geography and the geographies of sexuality by drawing upon one year of embedded in situ observations of dogs and their human companions at three public dog parks in Portland, Oregon. The purpose of this research is to uncover emerging themes in human and canine interactive behavioral patterns in urban dog parks to better understand human a-/moral decision-making in public spaces and uncover bias and emergent assumptions around gender, race, and sexuality. Specifically, and in order of priority, I examine the following questions: (1) How do human companions manage, contribute, and respond to violence in dogs? (2) What issues surround queer performativity and human reaction to homosexual sex between and among dogs? and (3) Do dogs suffer oppression based upon (perceived) gender? It concludes by applying Black feminist criminology categories through which my observations can be understood and by inferring from lessons relevant to human and dog interactions to suggest practical applications that disrupts hegemonic masculinities and improves access to emancipatory spaces. ( Read more... ) * * * про то, как можно бороться с rape culture на собачьих площадках, и каким образом методы тренировки собак следует применять к мужчинам. ...Many papers advocated highly dubious ethics including training men like dogs ("Dog Park"), punishing white male college students for historical slavery by asking them to sit in silence in the floor in chains during class and to be expected to learn from the discomfort ("Progressive Stack"), celebrating morbid obesity as a healthy life-choice ("Fat Bodybuilding"), treating privately conducted masturbation as a form of sexual violence against women ("Masturbation"), and programming superintelligent AI with irrational and ideological nonsense before letting it rule the world ("Feminist AI"). There was also considerable silliness including claiming to have tactfully inspected the genitals of slightly fewer than 10,000 dogs whilst interrogating owners as to their sexuality ("Dog Park"), becoming seemingly mystified about why heterosexual men are attracted to women ("Hooters"), insisting there is something to be learned about feminism by having four guys watch thousands of hours of hardcore pornography over the course of a year while repeatedly taking the Gender and Science Implicit Associations Test ("Porn"), expressing confusion over why people are more concerned about the genitalia others have when considering having sex with them ("CisNorm"), and recommending men anally self-penetrate in order to become less transphobic, more feminist, and more concerned about the horrors of rape culture ("Dildos"). None of this, except that Helen Wilson recorded one "dog rape per hour" at urban dog parks in Portland, Oregon, raised so much as a single reviewer eyebrow, so far as their reports show. * * * В результате своего исследования, граждане установили, что феминистские науки ("grievance studies") разрушают академию, потому что исходят из моральных императивов, а не из научного метода. Результатом grievance studies является, опять-таки, не исследование, а методика борьбы с сексизмом, расизмом, неоколониализмом, исламофобией. То есть "gender studies" это не столько наука, сколько набор этических догм и требований. Более того, в фундаменте grievance studies лежит постулат о вредоносности обычной науки и несогласие с научным методом, который этически неоправдан, ибо является сексистским, расистским, неоколониальным и гомофобским. ...Any scholarship that proceeds from radically skeptical assumptions about objective truth by definition does not and cannot find objective truth. Instead it promotes prejudices and opinions and calls them "truths." For radical constructivists, these opinions are specifically rooted a political agenda of "Social Justice" (which we have intentionally made into a proper noun to distinguish it from the type of real social progress falling under the same name). Because of critical constructivism, which sees knowledge as a product of unjust power balances, and because of this brand of radical skepticism, which rejects objective truth, these scholars are like snake-oil salespeople who diagnose our society as being riddled with a disease only they can cure. That disease, as they see it, is endemic to any society that forwards the agency of the individual and the existence of objective (or scientifically knowable) truths. Изрядная часть статей (принятых к печати) представляют собой обработку нескольких глав Mein Kampf, полученную заменой еврейского капитала на патриархию, с добавлением цитат из именитых исследователей, которые подтверждают тезисы авторов. Мораль номер один (но мы и так это знали): академические стандарты в "gender studies" (и в целом в "social studies") практически отсутствуют. Мораль номер два - можно делать много полезных выводов из публикаций, даже несмотря на то, что это бред: далеко не каждый бред публикуем, а только тот, что укладывается в доминантный дискурс. Поэтому чтение бреда полезно, ибо позволяет лучше понимать начальственные позывы. Конечно, данное нам в ощущениях начальство не всегда следует феминизму, антиколониализму и прочим артефактам доминантного дискурса. Но это частности. Истинная власть это та, которая контролирует слова и мысли, а не та, которая сидит в белом доме и пишет идиотскую чепуху в твиттер. Привет Current Mood: |
sick| Previous Day | 2018/10/03 [Archive] |
Next Day |