toyprotector

Substituting human labor for machine labor is unsustainable in the long run

Mon, 22 Dec 2025 19:42:12 GMT

What will happen: mass unemployment, severe decrease in consumption, economic depression.
Humans will forget many skills.
It will be terrible.

Comments

Reply to 4chan post on /x/

Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:56:45 GMT

.Anonymous
07/16/23(Sun)07:17:45 No.35309932
265 KB
265 KB JPG
suffering is beneficent as there exists no other impetus to draw beings out of distress and towards furthered wellness
it is all-but as crucial to the morphology of reality as orgasm itself
there is no evil
everything is fundamentally Good.

-----
You are retarded but I don't blame you. You started with a correct but imprecisely expressed insight, which if betterly put would be: suffering exists as a signal whose purpose is alerting the living body of potential or real damage to itself in any sphere it imagines as important (including here psychological suffering) to "convince it" to try to prevent the damage from being furthered and thus to protect it. But from this you jump to "it is (...) crucial to the morphology of reality" and "there is no evil", things which not only do not follow, but are easily disproved by anyone with the minimum of reflection on the subject. There is evil! Or else what do you call the damage to the living body that the suffering mechanism was alerting the living body about? Getting poked in the eye is an evil to try to ward off, as is getting your hand burned. It's not evil because it hurts, it's evil because it damages the living body, making it less likely to survive. Saying "suffering is crucial to the morphology of reality" ia akin to saying "reality would have no morphology without suffering" or "reality's morphology necessarily has suffering" whereas suffering is an evolved trait of living beings, which have not always existed, as showed by the theories of evolution and abiogenesis. So... at the time living beings weren't here yet, reality had no suffering, but you said reality necessarily has suffering at all times. Absurd. QED. I guess the source of your errors must be that you're stuck in some form of psychological realism, that is, you must believe that there is no reality to external objects independent of the human mind (or animal mind, etc).

Comments

Estou aprendendo a jogar xadrez

Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:41:02 GMT

No gif, vitória contra o bot Catspurrov do chess.com

Comments

Lesswrongueiros são retardados

Fri, 27 May 2022 22:45:46 GMT

Lesswrongueiros são retardados porque eles associam bem e mal com sofrimento (bem reduz sofrimento, mal aumenta sofrimento) em vez de com existência, que seria o correto.
Bom é o que faz bem, isto é, o que beneficia (a existência de) algo, torna mais permanente, engrandece, torna mais fácil ou provável.
Mau é o que faz mal, i.e., o que maleficia (a existência de) algo, torna menos permanente, apequena, torna menos fácil ou provável.
(Note o contraste positivo/negativo.)
Neutristas evitam esses conceitos, que são tão fundamentais ao senso comum, mas infelizmente devido às reservas de alguns acabam não ficando tão claros.
Esses dois fariam parte dos meus conceitos fundamentais.

Confundir e fazer o bem ser o negativo e o mal o positivo com o sofrimento como medida faz esquecer que o sofrimento é apenas o meio que o ser vivo possui para fazer saber a si mesmo que sua própria existência está sendo reduzida.

Essa confusão leva a absurdos tais como a idéia de que seria um grande bem o extermínio (ou extinção) da população humana visto que isso eliminaria toda actualidade e possibilidade de sofrimento dela. O apelo do suicídio repousa em uma confusão análoga. Nestes dois casos o bem que o sofrimento visava preservar ao sinalizar sua precarização (a existência) e mover o ser para que faça algo é paradoxalmente sacrificado.

Comments

Breaking content security

Fri, 08 May 2020 16:57:51 GMT

Comments

Thu, 07 May 2020 16:39:06 GMT

Hello, world. This is my first entry. Who am I? Toy Protector, the protector of toys. What do I want? To protect toys. From who? From those who would shame them. For instance? Antipathic women who value maturity way too high. Why would they value it so highly? Because they are looking for partners who are responsible and unimaginative to leech on. Terrible!

Comments