webpadre's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]

Friday, October 1st, 2004

    Time Event
    4:43p
    2004-103 from a poor monk:
    As we begin this third consideration of prayer, we
    might say that, rather than springing the idea of prayer on anyone right
    off the bat, we might want to encourage them to begin by examining their life
    with others, ie., about how necessary it is for them to be good
    with their families, with their co-workers, with people who
    need their help, etc.  As we do this, it will become clear to us that
    we need God's assistance throughout life, especially if we are to be
    good
    .  And prayer in a "non-good" person is somewhat ridiculous to
    conceive of.

     

    But, to go on, having seen what some ancients said
    about prayer, we might briefly note what others said about prayer
    in times past:  Basil, the Great, descibed it as asking for God for
    everything we need, while Evagrius called it the lifting of the spirit to God
    and colloquium with him.  St John of Damascus said it was asking for what
    we need as well as lifting our minds and hearts to God.  But again, we have
    to note that these are descriptions, not hard and fast
    definitions.

     

    As we also said, all religions advocate prayer and
    consider it, for the most part, as asking for the help we need from God.
    That seems to be a kind of universal human understanding of prayer, perhaps what
    we want it to be...  Thus, we have short ejaculatory
    phrases such as God, help me...Lord, be merciful to
    me...Hear me, Lord...  This is an attitude of mind found
    throughout the Bible and always presupposes an anthropomorphic
    conception of God.
      By this we mean, that God was depicted not
    only in our thoughts and words as human, but also in our general
    approach to him.  Therefore, we thought of God in terms of, e.g., "his
    leaning his ear to us"..."his listening to us"..."his having mercy on us"..."his
    being moved" to do something or other for us, etc.  However, Greek
    philosophy
    gradually clarified our notion of God,
    purifying it of most of its anthropomorphic attributes.  It presented God
    to us in terms of his goodness, his beauty, and his being the cause of all
    order, etc.    Thus, the person with understanding realizes that we
    cannot bend God's will to do as we want, but that prayer is about our bending
    OUR wills to do as HE wants of us. Such a person, furthermore, tries
    to elevate his mind and heart to the Lord to contemplate his
    perfections
    ...i.e., his goodness, his power, his mercy, his glory, his
    holiness, etc., etc.,  

     

    Such greats as Plato, Aristotle, Marcus Aurelius,
    etc., thought of God in this way and Evagrius, the fourth century Egyptian monk
    again, taking their thoughts about God into the christian context, pointed out
    that for christians, however, God was first and foremost FATHER.  Thus
    christians have to see in God not some supernatural inanimate power, but rather,
    the PERSON that he is in actuality. So, even if certain attributes of God in the
    Bible resemble more the Egyptian and/or Babylonian concepts, it is nevertheless
    typically biblical to see God as a person, as father, as one who
    descends, so to speak, to SPEAK with humans.  So the Old Testament clearly
    shows God as one with whom man speaks, with whom
    humans are in dialogue
    .  And of course, this is what we see in Christ
    and his relationship with the Father.

     

    Will continue next time.  In the meantime,
    best to all, and don't get discouraged.  Understanding anything is
    work...

    << Previous Day 2004/10/01
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

About LJ.Rossia.org