| We badly underestimated greenpeace |
[Feb. 9th, 2014|03:08 pm] |
Look at their conceptual dogma: "get natural".
But what is natural? Is a beaver's dam natural?
Well, we all have laughed enough on the absurdity of the distinction between natural and non-natural.
It's time to get serious.
Are we natural?
Is there anything on earth that is not?
If we carefully apply "natural" criterion to the things retrospectively to the very origin of all, we will find everything "natural". Indeed, "non-natural" shall designate something out of natural order, but nothing is possible that do not follow the rules of The Nature.
A beaver is is a part of this order, it creates a dam which is consequently a part of the same order.
We are a part of this order (naturally evolved from apes)...
Where's the catch?
Notion of "non-natural" inevitably creates yet another paradox of Allmighty God -- no more and no less.
Telling "natural" from "non-natural" is completely indistinguishable from telling God's will!
You know the consequences, don't u?
Hail another religion!
A terribly nicely disguised religion.
Why don't you worry about disguised religions more than about straight ones? |
|
|