| On The Cause Of Feminism |
[Sep. 17th, 2017|08:30 am] |
Let's take for example a peacock tail.
There must be a gene that encodes the shape of the illustrious tail.
This gene has to be carried by both sexes (actually it is slightly more true for birds than for mammals (see ZW sex determination)).
If this gene does not manifest in female bodies it quickly loses the evolutionary "race" against a version of the gene that does manifest in female bodies as ADORATION OF THE TAIL.
If a gene that encodes a sex-specific feature also encodes a sexual selection preference for this feature in the opposite sex, it gets a positive feedback loop that wins like hell.
A rape gene that makes males rapie is, thus, destined to somehow promote self through sexual selection on the female part. And it is very easy to do: it is enough to make a female PROVOCATIVE + INDISCRIMINATELY DISMISSIVE -- a very simple behavioural pattern that 100% ensures that only rapie males would ever get any chance to copulate with this female.
Adoration of a very specific tail shape is a complex psychological phenomenon, you may doubt if it is even possible to encode in DNA, while adoration of rape is as trivial as hunger or disgust (provocative+dismissive is all it takes).
On the "feelings" level this gene will manifest as a feeling that all sex is violent, wrong, and there is not such thing as a consenting female. And it is getting simpler still for the gene: it be limited to doing IDENTICAL JOB in both sexes -- instill the strong psychological association between sex and violence, it will work to the same end in males and females alike (males will quit negotiating, and females will exclude negotiating males from reproduction) -- win-win.
And this is exactly what feminism does!!!
It promotes the idea that consensual sex is impossible!!!
And for the feminism to be genetically determined in the manner desribed above the feminism itself does not have to have any selection/survival value. (read this sentence again, there is no "group selection" involved, i am very careful about slapping evolution to groups of people or social phenomena)
Feminism is a byproduct of the rape gene. First there is a genuine feeling that sex is innately violent and then there is a rationalization of this feeling manifesting as a social movement. Those people (promoting slut walks and ridiculous "standards" of consent) they honestly believe that WOMEN CAN NOT CONSENT.
Their innate (genetically determined) attitude towards sexual relations is the reason why you are failing to argue with feminists -- because you are arguing colours with a colour blind person!
It is, however, a pure coincidence that this hypothetical (for now) gene does the same job in individuals and collectives alike. Individual feeling about sex relations predisposes an individual to a certain behaviour, and the same feeling accurately expressed by Feminism in words (ideas, laws, whatever) promotes the same behaviour, namely rape.
Feminism in effect NORMALIZES RAPE, whatever they do, they are making us to believe that rape is the only way a boy can get any piece of a pussy.
I conjecture that they do it because they feel exatcly this way, they say exactly what they think. Do you find it too much unrealistic to conjecture that feminists really believe what they preach?
With this conjecture there is no "malevolence" argument on my part -- these people are not required to understand what they are doing, they are not required to plan their movement to be destructive -- they simply express their feelings as accurately as they can and it happened to be very good for the gene they are carrying. |
|
|