Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет Richard Stallman's Political Notes ([info]syn_rms)
@ 2022-08-17 23:48:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Air pollution

*Even low levels of air pollution can damage health , study finds.*

Don't panic, though — a tiny concentration of air pollution will normally do a tiny amount of harm, which is hard to measure without a sample of millions.

In the absence of any standard of perfection (keep air pollution under level L and it will do exactly zero damage), how should we decide how much to work to reduce air pollution? It's a matter of how the danger from air pollution stacks up against all the other dangers we face. Suppose we decide to spend a billion dollars on public health, which allocation of funds would we rationally expect to make the biggest improvement? Part of that plan could be spending to reduce air pollution.



(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)