Twitter whistleblower

The Twitter whistleblower says that Chinese, Russian and Indian government agents are getting special surveillance cooperation from Twitter.

The article talks in a vague sense about "intellectual property rights" that Twitter would need license for in order to train AI systems on various databases. Because that term is a misguided overgeneralization, the statement gives us no clue about which law it is actually talking about. None of the various laws that are foolishly lumped together under that term would be relevant to this. Maybe the statement is garbled, or has been confused by the use of the misleading generalization.