Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет LWN.net ([info]syn_lwnheadline)
@ 2016-04-18 13:14:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
How Badlock was discovered and fixed
This
post on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux blog
describes the discovery and
repair of the "Badlock" vulnerability. One begins to understand a little
better why it took as long as it did. "The code was rewritten; in
March 2016 the changes needed to fix all eight CVEs amounted to about 200
individual patches against a development version of Samba, with about half
of those responsible for fixing CVE-2015-5370. When backported to previous
stable Samba versions, they needed additional hundred patches. To oldest
supported Samba version — about four hundred patches. What started as an
individual snowflake became an avalanche but it wasn’t finished
yet.
"


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)