Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет LWN.net ([info]syn_lwnheadline)
@ 2019-08-29 16:58:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
[$] Change IDs for kernel patches
For all its faults, email has long proved
to be an effective communication
mechanism for kernel development. Similarly, Git is an effective tool for
source-code management. But there is no real connection between the two,
meaning that there is no straightforward way to connect a Git commit with
the email discussions that led to its acceptance. Once a patch enters a
repository, it transitions into a new form of existence and leaves its past
life behind. Doug Anderson recently went to the ksummit-discuss list with
a
proposal
to add Gerrit-style change IDs as a way of connecting the two
lives of a kernel patch; the end result may not be quite what he was asking
for.


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)