Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет LWN.net ([info]syn_lwnheadline)
@ 2020-05-18 18:52:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
[$] The many faces of "latency nice"
A task's "nice" value describes its priority within the completely fair
scheduler; its semantics have roots in ancient Unix tradition. Last
August, a "latency
nice" parameter
was proposed to provide similar control over a task's
response-time requirements. At the 2020 Power Management and Scheduling
in the Linux Kernel summit
(OSPM), Parth Shah, Chris Hyser, and Dietmar
Eggemann ran a discussion about the latency nice proposal; it seems that
everybody agrees that it would be a useful feature to have, but there is a
wide variety of opinions about what it should actually do.


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)