|
|
Пишет LWN.net (![[info]](http://lj.rossia.org/img/syndicated.gif){kind=small} syn_lwnheadline)@ 2020-07-03 18:32:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Book: Perl 7: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
Dan Book has done a
detailed analysis of the Perl 7
transition. "Large amount of CPAN modules will not work in Perl
7; plans for working around this would either involve every affected CPAN
author, which is a virtual impossibility for the stated 1 year time frame;
or the toolchain group, a loose group of people who each maintain various
modules and systems that are necessary for CPAN to function, who either
have not been consulted as of yet or have not revealed their plans related
to the tools they maintain. Going into this potential problem sufficiently
would be longer than this blog post, but suffice to say that a Perl where
highly used CPAN modules don't seamlessly work is not Perl."
Dan Book has done a
detailed analysis of the Perl 7
transition. "Large amount of CPAN modules will not work in Perl
7; plans for working around this would either involve every affected CPAN
author, which is a virtual impossibility for the stated 1 year time frame;
or the toolchain group, a loose group of people who each maintain various
modules and systems that are necessary for CPAN to function, who either
have not been consulted as of yet or have not revealed their plans related
to the tools they maintain. Going into this potential problem sufficiently
would be longer than this blog post, but suffice to say that a Perl where
highly used CPAN modules don't seamlessly work is not Perl."
