Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет LWN.net ([info]syn_lwnheadline)
@ 2014-06-10 13:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Kuhn: Why your project doesn't need a contributor licensing agreement
Bradley Kuhn tells free
software projects
that they need not worry about contributor license
agreements. "Thus, I encourage those considering a CLA to look past
the 'nice assurances we'd like to have — all things being equal' and focus
on the 'what legal assurances our FLOSS project actually needs to assure
its thrives'. I've spent years doing that analysis; I've concluded quite
simply: in this regard, all a project and its legal home actually need is a
clear statement and/or assent from the contributor that they offer the
contribution under the project's known FLOSS license.
"


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)