Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет LWN.net ([info]syn_lwnheadline)
@ 2020-01-28 22:17:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
[$] Cryptography and elections
Transparent and verifiable electronic elections are technically feasible,
but for a variety of reasons, the techniques used are not actually viable for
running most elections—and definitely not for remote voting. That was one of the
main takeaways from a keynote at this year's linux.conf.au given by University of
Melbourne Associate
Professor Vanessa Teague. She is a cryptographer who, along with her
colleagues, has investigated
several kinds of e-voting software; as is
probably not all that much of a surprise, what they found is buggy
implementations. She described some of that work in a
talk that was a mix of math with software-company and government missteps; the latter may
directly impact many of the Australian locals who were in attendance.


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)