суточные щи -

As an aspiring writer, many years ago, I learned that the behaviour of every person in the novel has to be motivated to minute details. If one fails with the task, the novel does not work - the characters behaving like wooden puppets in the children's theatre don't compel the reader's empathy and self-identification with these characters, - and that's how many mediocre novels fail.
Well, I read the "Charlie Kirk assassination" novel, and I fail to see Tyler Robinson's motivation.
No doubt that the brainwashed Left will project their programmed hatred onto Charlie Kirk and their imaginary courage onto Tyler Robinson.
No doubt that the MAGA Right will project their ideas about Leftist sectarian lunacy onto Tyler Robinson as well.
But Tyler himself, as a singular character in this story, is missing motives strong enough to commit - not only an act of murder - but an apparent well-honed preparation for assassination.
His skills with a rifle are worse than questionable. I spent hours and days shooting at the rifle range with my Mosin Nagant bolt action rifle, as old as the Mauser used in the assassination, and sporterised in a similar way with the scope, - and I still have troubles at 200m distance. Landing a perfect, deadly shot at 200 in the open air takes a lot of practice.
I went hunting and I practice regularly, and I still miss a lot.
Tyler apparently did no such training, and he made a single perfectly deadly shot.
He had nothing but a childish "obsession with guns". Sorry, but that does not make you a good shooter. This is actually a regurgitation of the old Feminist/Inner city Liberal fable - men are obsessed with guns, they create the Gun Culture, which leads to guns killing people. Nope. I don't buy it. If a fetishist "gun culture" exists anywhere in observable reality, it is in Black Rappers' circles. That kind of gun violence, with brandishing illegal handguns and random group shootouts, is very distinct from what we are dealing with in this instance. The gun in this instance was used as a precision instrument, and this implies professional handling.
And a dislike of Charlie Kirk, expressed once and casually, does not make you a dedicated assassin.
And how about the preparation for the assassination? Studying the area, observing the angles, marking the ways in and out? That's a long, laborious task even for a seasoned professional sniper.
So, I just don't believe the narrative.
And I know there is no better narrative so far.
So my general disbelief does not carry any message pointing to any other particular direction.
I am just trying to make myself aware of the people who may actually be seriously (business-like) interested in getting Charlie Kirk out of US university campuses and US politics in general.
So far, way too many potential actors.