| Comments: |
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/26829/2147503517) | | | trade bloggers for j's | (Link) |
|
The obvious bias in the text above is towards mentioning information from blogs. Which is tantamount to the very same disease - each side is pulling the blanket its way.
This is not to say that B. did a good job - my understanding is that he hadn't actually said anything outside of the typical "Шарынь на кичку!"...
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | April 15th, 2004 - 09:39 am |
|---|
| | Сарынь | (Link) |
|
Как раз на-днях читал о происхождении этого выражения, по твоей же наводке. :-) Of course it was about the blogs, specifically blogs versus the conventional media. But it was not politically biased: there are plenty of left-wing blogs as well as right-wing ones. Also, if you read instapundit carefully, you will see he is actually independent and formerly a Democrat. Here it shows too, his questions are not that pleasant to the president, and at the same time cannot be brushed off as partisan politicking.
Well, I am not attacting his _political_ bias - I have enough of political bias of my own. The point really was "us vs. them", where "us" were the bloggers. Now, just how _do_ you imagine yourself this:
"Mr. President, why do American soldiers in their blogs paint a different picture of Iraq?"
"What's a 'blog'?"
That is unless the previous day's executive president's brief was "Internet culture and national security"....
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | April 15th, 2004 - 10:46 am |
|---|
| | На кичке | (Link) |
|
There are many reasons Bush is not likely to give a good answer to these questions. But the message was directed by Instapundit towards members of the press, not to him. Of course the blogs will not replace the media, but they are a good supplement and can have a revigorating effect. They are being noticed.
I should probably try to better explain what I meant. Basically, I tend to agree with the assessement that the questions could have been tougher etc... But I find the proposed list of questions to be self-promoting and thus, somewhat disingenuous. The very same point could have been made without attracting attention to the witty author and the wonderful new medium he uses to express thoughts.
Nevermind... You will post something tomorrow, and we'll argue more...
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | April 15th, 2004 - 03:43 pm |
|---|
| | Re: На кичке | (Link) |
|
The blog questions are tongue-in-cheek, but there are real questions there as well.
I did not catch the tongue-in-cheek aspect of it. | |