| "U.S. Marine kills wounded insurgent" Petition |
[Nov. 21st, 2004|07:34 pm] |
|
I did not sign it. |
|
|
| Comments: |
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | November 21st, 2004 - 02:22 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
I think such cases need to be studied, case by case, in military courts. In most cases, I am sure, the accused will be let free, and in such cases they deserve some kind of official recognition, not a medal, but a kind of letter of appreciation or something. In some cases, however, there will be abuse, and these should be prosecuted.
what are you talking about? ...>>there will be abuse,<<...
shame on you.
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | November 21st, 2004 - 02:50 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
There will be abuse. Every army has some. Marines are professionals and would not usually abuse the rules. However, there are and always will be exceptions. There is a good reason judicial system exists, isn't there? I cannot vouchsafe for its 100% accuracy in making decisions, but neither can one when seaking for the marines in a battle.
As for this particular case, people may confuse the following situations: (1) The shooting was the right thing to do; (2) the shooting was wrong, but the marine followed the rules and therefore did the right thing, and the killed Iraqi is an unfortunate victim of conditions; (3) the shooting was wrong and the marine has to be punished. I think a careful consideration will cleaar this up. I am inclined to see this as (2), but I would postpone any judgement.
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | November 21st, 2004 - 04:31 pm |
|---|
| | Some typos | (Link) |
|
I am prone to little typos recently, but which word I meant to write when I wrote "seaking" I have no idea.
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | November 22nd, 2004 - 07:38 am |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Yeah, possibly.
A more interesting question is why you, after deciding you won't be singing it, mentioned it here...
(ps. I, obviously, did not sign it).
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | November 21st, 2004 - 02:50 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Because I think this is an interesting phenomenon. Opinions on both sides seem to be formed without much independent thinking, and still they run strong. You might also ask me why I mention stayput.org while not adhering to their political agenda. A phenomenon. :-)
| From: | vkelman@lj |
| Date: | November 21st, 2004 - 04:48 pm |
|---|
| | Opinions on both sides seem to be formed without much independent thinking | (Link) |
|
Totally agree.
Opinions on both sides seem to be formed without much independent thinking, and still they run strong.
It surprises you?
From my particular standpoint, I do not find this petition, or a possible alternative petition to stop killing Iraqis, interesting. They are absolutely predictable, and, at this stage, serve no purpose.
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | November 22nd, 2004 - 07:39 am |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
It does not surprise me. But I think it is an interesting phenomenon. I also thought that some of my friends might want to sign it.
| |