| Comments: |
I have not seen this post, before I posted something else referring to him. LJ-synchronicity rules (1 hour of difference)...
He is observing an anniversary of a terrorist attack by giving shooting lessons?
You sure you linked to the right post?
Of course, what could be wrong with that?
Training for combat/self-defense is what a libertarian would do in the face of terrorism.
Let us leave for the for moment the utter sillyness of the idea of defending with a handgun from " the face of terrorism" (and yes, this is something I'd expect a libertatian to do). What I was wondering about is why cema@lj decided that a note of someone doing target practice on September 11 was worth linking. Most of cema@lj's "serious" links tend to point to articles which (whether I agree with them or not) tend to contain actual expressions of thoughts or, at the very least, opinions. Maybe I missed something in the text?
strike that "about" from the second sentence.
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | September 13th, 2005 - 01:12 am |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
I simply think this is interesting. People react in different ways.
So, for the sake of stupid me - you did link it because of the shooting thing?
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/3765/2147484590) | | From: | cema@lj |
| Date: | September 13th, 2005 - 12:34 pm |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Actually, no; it did not strike me as anything unusual, frankly. The fact that a law professor is teaching a Marine how to shoot (handguns, but still) loooked funny to me.
| |