cema - Chinese mothers are not su! [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
cema

[ userinfo | ljr userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Chinese mothers are not su! [Jan. 14th, 2011|06:12 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
Here is the proof: http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2011/01/why_chinese_mothers_are_not_su.html

:-)
LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
From:[info]dimrub@lj
Date:January 14th, 2011 - 08:01 pm
(Link)
I was almost expecting some kind of geeky comparison joke. Something like "A chinese mother won't allow you to mount".
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 02:00 am
(Link)
They usually don't...
[User Picture]
From:[info]ygam@lj
Date:January 14th, 2011 - 08:55 pm
(Link)
broken link
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 01:59 am
(Link)
Really? It's working for me. What's broken?
[User Picture]
From:[info]oregosha@lj
Date:January 14th, 2011 - 09:18 pm
(Link)
Ну, слава б-гу, что не su. So they won't override (overwrite?!) my rules "How to compile the kids"
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 02:03 am
(Link)
Kids should be interpreted, not compiled!
[User Picture]
From:[info]oregosha@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 01:01 pm
(Link)
Oh, yes, sure!!!!
Поучайте лучше ваших паучат! ;)))

[On a side note, you need to put something in, before trying to interpret...]
[User Picture]
From:[info]spamsink@lj
Date:January 14th, 2011 - 09:24 pm
(Link)
Я уже говорил у кого-то недавно, что корень зла - это цель американских учебных заведений to maximize quality of the student body вместо цели выпускать наиболее квалифицированных специалистов по выбранным ими специальностям.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 02:02 am
(Link)
It's hard to say what's best for the students and for the country. In the long run it can be the student body.
From:[info]calypso72@lj
Date:January 14th, 2011 - 11:12 pm
(Link)
That was awesome.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 02:00 am
(Link)
A great read, one of the best I have had this year so far.
[User Picture]
From:[info]eta_ta@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 12:04 pm
(Link)
except the last paragraph and overall conclusion.

as [correctly] noted in the comments, WSJ published the excerpts within framework of her agent's PR campaign for the coming book. Nothing as exciting as an author' imaginative capitalist-conformist conspiracy theory.
[User Picture]
From:[info]baniram@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 12:10 am
(Link)
да уж :)
[User Picture]
From:[info]gingema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 02:07 am
(Link)
Длинный текстъ, так что в детали не вчитывалась. Но мысль о том что good child = high ROI очень понравилась.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 02:50 am
(Link)
MBA speaking! :-)
[User Picture]
From:[info]gingema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 02:54 am
(Link)
На всякий случай поясняю: понравилось то, что верно подмечено как способ мышления некоторых (MBAs, yea), а идея - идиотская.
Да, еще на всякий случай - у меня нет MBA.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:January 15th, 2011 - 04:04 am
(Link)
Well, the original author is not an MBA either. However, the original article was in WSJ and the author of the response article mentioned it kind of follows the line.
From:[info]mayzhubk@lj
Date:February 7th, 2011 - 12:17 pm



(Link)
Шедевр