cema - The News They Kept to Themselves [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
cema

[ userinfo | ljr userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

The News They Kept to Themselves [Apr. 11th, 2003|12:04 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
I don't know how to comment this. Just read it.

April 11, 2003
The News We Kept to Ourselves
By EASON JORDAN


ATLANTA — Over the last dozen years I made 13 trips to Baghdad to lobby the government to keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open and to arrange interviews with Iraqi leaders. Each time I visited, I became more distressed by what I saw and heard — awful things that could not be reported because doing so would have jeopardized the lives of Iraqis, particularly those on our Baghdad staff.

For example, in the mid-1990's one of our Iraqi cameramen was abducted. For weeks he was beaten and subjected to electroshock torture in the basement of a secret police headquarters because he refused to confirm the government's ludicrous suspicion that I was the Central Intelligence Agency's Iraq station chief. CNN had been in Baghdad long enough to know that telling the world about the torture of one of its employees would almost certainly have gotten him killed and put his family and co-workers at grave risk.

Working for a foreign news organization provided Iraqi citizens no protection. The secret police terrorized Iraqis working for international press services who were courageous enough to try to provide accurate reporting. Some vanished, never to be heard from again. Others disappeared and then surfaced later with whispered tales of being hauled off and tortured in unimaginable ways. Obviously, other news organizations were in the same bind we were when it came to reporting on their own workers.

We also had to worry that our reporting might endanger Iraqis not on our payroll. I knew that CNN could not report that Saddam Hussein's eldest son, Uday, told me in 1995 that he intended to assassinate two of his brothers-in-law who had defected and also the man giving them asylum, King Hussein of Jordan. If we had gone with the story, I was sure he would have responded by killing the Iraqi translator who was the only other participant in the meeting. After all, secret police thugs brutalized even senior officials of the Information Ministry, just to keep them in line (one such official has long been missing all his fingernails).

Still, I felt I had a moral obligation to warn Jordan's monarch, and I did so the next day. King Hussein dismissed the threat as a madman's rant. A few months later Uday lured the brothers-in-law back to Baghdad; they were soon killed.

I came to know several Iraqi officials well enough that they confided in me that Saddam Hussein was a maniac who had to be removed. One Foreign Ministry officer told me of a colleague who, finding out his brother had been executed by the regime, was forced, as a test of loyalty, to write a letter of congratulations on the act to Saddam Hussein. An aide to Uday once told me why he had no front teeth: henchmen had ripped them out with pliers and told him never to wear dentures, so he would always remember the price to be paid for upsetting his boss. Again, we could not broadcast anything these men said to us.

Last December, when I told Information Minister Muhammad Said al-Sahhaf that we intended to send reporters to Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq, he warned me they would "suffer the severest possible consequences." CNN went ahead, and in March, Kurdish officials presented us with evidence that they had thwarted an armed attack on our quarters in Erbil. This included videotaped confessions of two men identifying themselves as Iraqi intelligence agents who said their bosses in Baghdad told them the hotel actually housed C.I.A. and Israeli agents. The Kurds offered to let us interview the suspects on camera, but we refused, for fear of endangering our staff in Baghdad.

Then there were the events that were not unreported but that nonetheless still haunt me. A 31-year-old Kuwaiti woman, Asrar Qabandi, was captured by Iraqi secret police occupying her country in 1990 for "crimes," one of which included speaking with CNN on the phone. They beat her daily for two months, forcing her father to watch. In January 1991, on the eve of the American-led offensive, they smashed her skull and tore her body apart limb by limb. A plastic bag containing her body parts was left on the doorstep of her family's home.

I felt awful having these stories bottled up inside me. Now that Saddam Hussein's regime is gone, I suspect we will hear many, many more gut-wrenching tales from Iraqis about the decades of torment. At last, these stories can be told freely.

Eason Jordan is chief news executive at CNN.



Update. This is also discussed [one|two] in the Wall Street Journal.
Update. Suggested CNN motto: We had to suppress the news in order to cover it.
Update. More links from the little green footballs.
Update. A discussion in Washington Times.
Update. An account from a former reporter.
LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
[User Picture]
From:[info]ge_m@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 04:47 am
(Link)
Спасибо.
Интересная, кстати, проблема - как журналистскому агентству в такой ситуации совмещать объективность с необходимостью продолжать передачу информации? Что лучше: публично перекошенная информация или разрыв отношений и прекращение потока информации вообще?
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 09:58 am
(Link)
Это вопрос интересный и очень важный. Ответа на него я не знаю.

Тут, кроме прочего, может возникнуть противоречие между журналистским долгом и человеческим. А не только вопрос о стоимости доступа.
[User Picture]
From:[info]ge_m@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 03:29 pm
(Link)
Интересно, что я уже прочитав про это, услышал по NPR беседу с редактором CNN о том же самом. Ему этот вопрос задавали, он сказал, что, дескать, "...откровенную ложь мы не передавали, но знание того, что за переданную тобой информацию человека могут убить, очень тяготило, и мы никогда не называли конкретных имён. Человеческий долг перед кем-то, кто мог пострадать, был для нас выше. Но теперь я решил, что нужно освободиться от груза и всё расказать..."
В общем-то, это общая проблема журналистов передающих из тоталитарных стран.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 03:40 pm
(Link)
это общая проблема журналистов передающих из тоталитарных стран.

Или в. Вспомни советских. Или возьми Аль Джазиру.
[User Picture]
From:[info]ge_m@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 10:58 pm
(Link)
Нет, я об этом подумал. То, что 'в', меня не интересует. У тех журналистов, да, масса проблем и по-человечески это интересно, и я им сочувствую, но теоретической актуальной проблемы тут нет, т.е. она есть, но ложная. Там, вообще, вся жизнь неправильная, и проблемы не только у журналистов.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 06:30 am

But there is more. Part I

(Link)
Eason Jordan
October 25, 2002


BOB GARFIELD:After journalists were expelled from Iraq on Thursday, CNN head of news-gathering Eason Jordan, called the move "a Draconian measure that will sharply curtail the world's knowledge about what is happening in Iraq. Iraq is often displeased with CNN," says Jordan, "but especially this week when the network reported from the scene of that extraordinary protest in Baghdad."

EASON JORDAN:The big beef was that we reported that gunfire was used to disperse the demonstrators which is absolutely irrefutable fact, but the Iraqi government sometimes denies the facts and refuses to acknowledge the truth.

BOB GARFIELD:Well what kind of weird conversation is it with the Iraqi officials that you're having when you're holding up a, a piece of videotape and saying this is black and they're saying no, no that's white. It's bizarre!

EASON JORDAN:Well there are a lot of bizarre things in Iraq, and unfortunately the Iraqi officials refuse to look at the videotape because they said they didn't care what it showed or what was heard on the tape because the reality -the Iraqi reality - was very different from the actual facts.

BOB GARFIELD:I'm sure you have seen Franklin Foer's article in The New Republic which charges that the Western press is appeasing the Iraqi regime in order to maintain its visas -- to be there reporting should a war ultimately break out. What's your take on that?

EASON JORDAN:The writer clearly doesn't have a clear understanding of the realities on the ground because CNN has demonstrated again and again that it has a spine; that it's prepared to be forthright; is forthright in its reporting. We wouldn't have a team in northern Iraq right now if we didn't want to upset the Saddam Hussein regime. We wouldn't report on the demonstration if we didn't want to upset the Saddam Hussein regime. We wouldn't have been thrown out of Iraq already 5 times over the last several years if we were there to please the Saddam Hussein regime. So the story was lopsided, unfair and chose to ignore facts that would refute the premise of the article.

BOB GARFIELD:Well what is the calculus? In the New Republic article he cites the coverage of Saddam Hussein's birthday by CNN which he deemed to be not a huge news event. Are you tossing bones to Saddam Hussein in order to be there when, when it really matters?

EASON JORDAN:No. I don't think that's the case at all. Now, there is Iraqi propaganda that is news! I mean there is propaganda from a lot of governments around the world that is newsworthy and we should report on those things. Saddam Hussein's birthday is a big deal in that country. We're not reading Iraqi propaganda; we're reporting as an independent news organization.


To be continued...
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 06:35 am

But there is more. Part II

(Link)
BOB GARFIELD:Back in '91 CNN and Peter Arnett in particular were heavily criticized, mostly by civilians, for reporting from within Baghdad during the U.S. attack in ways that they'd consider to be utter propaganda and to-- out of context and not reflecting the overall reality of Saddam Hussein' regime. Have you analyzed what you can get access to without appearing to be just a propaganda tool for Saddam?

EASON JORDAN:Well absolutely. I mean we work very hard to report forthrightly, to report fairly and to report accurately and if we ever determine we cannot do that, then we would not want to be there; but we do think that some light is better than no light whatsoever. I think that the world, the American people will be shortchanged if foreign journalists are kicked out, because even in Peter Arnett's case there were things that he reported on -- and this is a long time ago now -- but things he reported on that I don't think would have been reported at all had he not been there. We feel committed to our Baghdad presence. We've had a bureau there for 12 years with occasional interruptions when we've been thrown out, but we're not there to please the Iraqi government -- we're not there to displease the Iraqi government -- we're just there to do our job.

BOB GARFIELD:Let's say there's an -- a second Gulf War. Is that the mother of all stories? Do you have to be there? Are there-- decisions you'll make on the margins to be s-- as certain as you possibly can that you will have a presence there?

EASON JORDAN:We'd very much like to be there if there's a second war; but-- we are not going to make journalistic compromises in an effort to make that happen, being mindful that in wartime there is censorship on all sides, and we're prepared to deal with a certain amount of censorship as long as it's not-- extreme, ridiculous censorship where -- which we've actually seen a number of cases in previous conflicts -- not just with Iraq. But-- sure! We want to be there, but it's --we don't want to be there come hell or high water. We want to be there if we can be there and operate as a responsible news organization.

BOB GARFIELD: Very well. Eason Jordan, thank you very much.

EASON JORDAN: Okay, thank you.

BOB GARFIELD:Eason Jordan is the chief news executive and news-gathering president for CNN News Group. He joined us from CNN studios in Atlanta.

copyright 2002 WNYC Radio
[User Picture]
From:[info]capka3m@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 07:26 am
(Link)
Cпасибо, Сема. Мне всегда была интересна механика этого процесса. Надеюсь, однако, что из CNN поступает к Президенту и в ЦРУ "белый ТАСС", пусть неформальный - иначе decision making becomes skewed. Наверняка поступает, косвенное подтверждение - предупреждение королю Иордании.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 09:33 am
(Link)
Очень надеюсь, что у него есть и другие источники. А у нас?
[User Picture]
From:[info]capka3m@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 10:24 am
(Link)
А мы и решений не принимаем :))) Но на самом деле не может быть однозначного ответа, что лучше - такая инфо, или никакой. Это только по влиянию на вероятность принятия правильного решения в каждом конкретном случае можно сказать...
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 03:04 pm
(Link)
На самом деле, мы принимаем решения. Для себя, для семьи. Для друзей иногда. Или такие: за кого голосовать, за кого воевать.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 03:46 pm
(Link)
а у Вас?
даты рождения Гитлера, Ленина, Сталина, Хуссейна
портреты Сталина, Хуссейна
запах серы
знание о методах работы СМИ (Вы же были в США во время
отторжения Косово)
представление о тоталитарных странах с маньяками у власти
[User Picture]
From:[info]cema@lj
Date:April 11th, 2003 - 05:17 pm
(Link)
Запах серы, это да. Но его к делу не подошьёшь.