Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет dm_krylov ([info]dm_krylov)
@ 2004-07-18 02:11:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
читая Мальтуса
1
It is said that the passion between the sexes is less ardent among the North American Indians than among any other race of men. Yet, notwithstanding this apathy, the effort towards population, even in this people, seems to be always greater than the means to support it. This appears from the comparatively rapid population that takes place whenever any of the tribes happen to settle in some fertile spot and to draw nourishment from more fruitful sources than that of hunting, and it has been frequently remarked that when an Indian family has taken up its abode near any European settlement and adopted a more easy and civilized mode of life, that one woman has reared five, or six, or more children, though in the savage state it rarely happens that above one or two in a family grow up to maturity.

/.../
2
The North American Indians, considered as a people, cannot justly be called free and equal. In all the accounts we have of them, and, indeed, of most other savage nations, the women are represented as much more completely in a state of slavery to the men than the poor are to the rich in civilized countries. One half the nation appears to act as Helots to the other half, and the misery that checks population falls chiefly, as it always must do, upon that part whose condition is lowest in the scale of society. The infancy of man in the simplest state requires considerable attention, but this necessary attention the women cannot give, condemned as they are to the inconveniences and hardships of frequent change of place and to the constant and unremitting drudgery of preparing every thing for the reception of their tyrannic lords.

An Essay on the Principle of Population ch.3 1798

Из века в век одно и то же. В нашем отношении современная версия англо-саксонской брехни выглядела так:
1 В СССР секса нет.
2 Гулаг. Женщины в СССР не свободны.


(Добавить комментарий)


[info]light_in_tunnel@lj
2004-07-18 13:44 (ссылка)
вечер добрый..
==
относительно сакраментальной фразы "В СССР секса нет" - http://polit.ru/news/2004/07/18/sexkprf.html

"18 лет назад была произнесена знаменитая фраза «В СССР секса нет». Эту реплику в 1986-м году обронила одна из участниц телевизионного моста Ленинград–Бостон, который вели журналисты Владимир Познер и Фил Донахью.

К этой дате на сайте КПРФ появилась анонимная статья, в которой говорится, что сердитая дама произнесла более сложное предложение: «В СССР секса нет на телевидении», но после слова «нет» в аудитории начали смеяться и последние слова «на телевидении» просто не расслышали".

(Ответить) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]dedushka@lj
2004-07-18 20:44 (ссылка)
Весьма кстати, спасибо.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)

а если наоборот
[info]wildant@lj
2004-07-18 18:55 (ссылка)
Some nights I lay awake and listened to my parents' lovemaking. I know white people keep it quite, pretend they don't even make love. My white friends tell me they can't even imagine their own parents getting it on. I know exactly what it sounds like when my parents are touching each other. It makes up for knowing exactly what they sound like when they're fighting. Plus and minus. Add and subtract. It comes out just about even.

Sherman Alexie (http://www.fallsapart.com/)

(Ответить) (Ветвь дискуссии)

Re: а если наоборот
[info]dedushka@lj
2004-07-18 20:45 (ссылка)
Да уж. Кто бы на эту тему давал нам советы: англо-саксонцы... ха-ха-ха!

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)