народ веселится
From: J. Christ III
Subject: Just read the book...the film is WAY different (spoilers)
Comment: First off, it seems that the book has (count 'em) FOUR _different_ versions of this guy's sorry story. What's up with that? The stories are similar but there are annoying differences. Were the writers going for a sort of Rashomon thing with telling a narrative from different perspectives? If so, it was just confusing. -------- SPOILER ------------- I didn't buy the whole "resurrection" thing. I mean, if he is going to come back to life, why just give a couple of speeches, eat some fried fish, then disappear again? And speaking of raising the dead whatever became of Lazarus? He must've ended up dying again eventually. There were just too many loose ends. I'm glad at least Gibson's film version decided to stick to telling just _one_ version of the story and eliminated a lot of needless fat. IMO, I think both the book and the movie might've benefitted from some more interesting restructuring. How about telling it "Memento"-style, i.e. in reverse chronological order? Show the dude gettin' crucified then show the events leading up to it, you know, how he ended up getting in trouble with the law in the first place. Or something.

Молодцы:)

(отсюда)