|
|
Пишет kassian (![[info]](http://lj.rossia.org/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} kassian)@ 2012-09-07 14:29:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Конференция памяти Н.Я. Мерперта «Локализация прародины индоевропейцев: новые данные» / «Indo-European Homeland and Migrations: Linguistics, Archeology and DNA»
12 сентября 2012. Москва. Российский государственный гуманитарный университет, ауд.228 («Профессорская»).
11:00 - 14:00
T. Gamkrelidze, V. Ivanov. Indo-European Homeland and Migrations: conclusions after half a century of studies and discussions.
V. Blažek. Indo-European Zoonyms in Afro-Asiatic Perspective.
A. Kassian. Lexical parallels between Sumerian and Hurro-Urartian: possible historical scenarios.
V.A. Dybo. Italo-Celtic vowel length and its significance for the reconstruction of Indo-European accent (in Russian with an English summary).
O. Mudrak. North-Caucasian Element in Armenian.
S. Kullanda. Early Indo-European Social Organization: Indo-European Roots of the Varna System.
15:00 - 19:30
P. Heggarty. The When, Where and Why of Indo-European Origins.
D. Anthony. Four Kinds of Pastoralism in the Middle Volga Stepps.
S. Grigorjev. Archaeological cultures of the Near East and Northern Eurasia in light of the Indo-European problem.
O. Balanovsky, E. Balanovskaja. Continuous debates on Indo-European genetics: gene pool structure, search for Indo-European marker, Neolitization of Europe and gene-language coevolution.
S. Burlak. Languages, DNA, Relationship and Contacts.
I. Yakubovich. Luwians and Pre-Hellenic substrate: assessing the evidence.
A. Dybo. Language and Archeology: some methodological problems.
Хендаут моего доклада: «Lexical isoglosses between Sumerian and Hurro-Urartian: possible historical scenarios».
The paper deals with lexical isoglosses between two ancient Near Eastern languages: Sumerian and Hurrian (Hurro-Urartian); namely several basic terms (like ‘hand’, ‘rain’ and so on) phonetically similar in both languages are discussed. Four possible scenarios are evaluated from the typological, etymological and statistical points of view: (1) chance coincidences; (2) lexical borrowings from Sumerian into Hurro-Urartian or vice versa; (3) genetic relationship between Sumerian and Hurro-Urartian; (4) prehistoric language shift: adoption by a Hurro-Urartian (or closely related) group of the Sumerian language or vice versa. Out of these four, two scenarios — lexical borrowings and genetic relationship — are typologically unlikely. The statistical probability of chance coincidences is low, although formally this explanation cannot be excluded. The fourth scenario — language shift — fits linguistic evidence and does not contradict archaeological data.
12 сентября 2012. Москва. Российский государственный гуманитарный университет, ауд.228 («Профессорская»).
11:00 - 14:00
15:00 - 19:30
Хендаут моего доклада: «Lexical isoglosses between Sumerian and Hurro-Urartian: possible historical scenarios».
The paper deals with lexical isoglosses between two ancient Near Eastern languages: Sumerian and Hurrian (Hurro-Urartian); namely several basic terms (like ‘hand’, ‘rain’ and so on) phonetically similar in both languages are discussed. Four possible scenarios are evaluated from the typological, etymological and statistical points of view: (1) chance coincidences; (2) lexical borrowings from Sumerian into Hurro-Urartian or vice versa; (3) genetic relationship between Sumerian and Hurro-Urartian; (4) prehistoric language shift: adoption by a Hurro-Urartian (or closely related) group of the Sumerian language or vice versa. Out of these four, two scenarios — lexical borrowings and genetic relationship — are typologically unlikely. The statistical probability of chance coincidences is low, although formally this explanation cannot be excluded. The fourth scenario — language shift — fits linguistic evidence and does not contradict archaeological data.
