| Zeitgeist: If one considers the development of a child, ... |
[May. 26th, 2006|05:28 pm] |
I believe that the most fruitful principle for gaining an overall view of the possible world-views will be to divide them up according to the degree and the manner of their affinity to or, respectively, turning away from metaphysics (or religion). In this way we immediately obtain a division into two groups: scepticism, materialism and positivism stand on one side, spiritualism, idealism and theology on the other.
Now it is a familiar fact, even a platitude, that the development of philosophy since the Renaissance has by and large gone from right to left...
It would truly be a miracle if this (I would like to say rabid) development had not also begun to make itself felt in the conception of mathematics. Actually, mathematics, by its nature as an a priori science, always has, in and of itself, an inclination toward the right, and, for this reason, has long withstood the spirit of the time [Zeitgeist] that has ruled since the Renaissance; i.e., the empiricist theory of mathematics, such as the one set forth by Mill, did not find much support. Indeed, mathematics has evolved into ever higher abstractions, away from matter and to ever greater clarity in its foundations (e.g., by giving an exact foundation of the infinitesimal calculus and the complex numbers) - thus, away from scepticism.
Finally, however, around the turn of the century, its hour struck: in particular, it was the antinomies of set theory, contradictions that allegedly appeared within mathematics, whose significance was exaggerated by sceptics and empiricists and which were employed as a pretext for the leftward upheaval. I say "allegedly" and "exaggerated" because, in the first place, these contradictions did not appear within mathematics but near its outermost boundary toward philosophy, and secondly, they have been resolved in a manner that is completely satisfactory and, for everyone who understands the theory, nearly obvious. Such arguments are, however, of no use against the spirit of the time, and so the result was that many or most mathematicians denied that mathematics, as it had developed previously, represents a system of truths.......
that curious hermaphroditic thing that Hilbert's formalism represent........
If one considers the development of a child, ....
Thanks to respicere |
|
|
| |
[May. 26th, 2006|05:51 pm] |
Раньше были анонимные доносы---теперь появились и анонимные ссылки в книжках...
В раннем возрасте у детей обычно бывает превосходная память и способность к восприятию нового.
К тому же в этом возрасте дети склонны во всём слушаться взрослых. Поэтому в этот
период нужно вложить им в голову как можно больше информации. Позже, когда их взгляд
на мир станет более критичным и они уже не захотят заниматься тем, в чём не видят смысла, им нужно давать больше времени на размышления, а также делать их учёбу более мотивированной>
.—Эту точку зрения я вычитал в одной интернетской статье. Автор концепции—профессор, специалист по нейрофизиологии. Поскольку я не называю его имени,
я позволю себе сказать без околичностей, что я об
этом думаю: этот б р е д с и в о й к о б ы лы не заслуживает комментария.
В Англии с недавних пор в начальной школе не учат наизусть _ничего_ -- к чему ведет
отсутствие тренировки памяти в детстве, никто не знает да и не пытался узнать...Только нейрофизиологи
да психологи волнуются. Спасибо тебе, т.Звонкин. |
|
|