(lj) Reply from suggestions@lj
Your message submitted to the moderated community suggestions has been
rejected by a moderator of that community.

Please note that replies to this email are not sent to the community's
moderator(s). If you would like to discuss the reasons for your entry's
rejection, you will need to contact a moderator directly.

Here are the reasons for the rejection as provided by the moderator:

For the most part, this probably isn't going to happen for legal and
logistical reasons.

This is the message you submitted:

Time: 2005-07-21 12:22
Subject: Preserving content and system integrity
Text:

Title
Preserving content and system integrity

Short, concise description of the idea
In case the journal is suspended because of objectionable post(s), hide
posts in question and leave other livejournal posts of suspended user
accessible.

Full description of the idea
In case the journal is suspended because of objectionable post(s), hide
posts in question and leave other livejournal posts of suspended user
accessible according to the rules established by suspended user (public /
friends-only etc.).
1) This will prevent from broken links from other journals
2) This will allow to keep discussion with suspended journal owner in other
(active) journals intact
3) This will allow to preserve content in the form of comments produced by
users whose jounrnals are not suspened in suspended journal (we talk about
posts that were not questioned and were not the reason for suspension).

An ordered list
of benefits

• 1. Preventing from broken links from other journals.
• 
  2. Keeping discussion with suspended journal owner in other (active) journals intact and meaningful.
• 
  3. Preserving content in the form of comments produced by users whose jounrnals are not suspened in suspended journal (I talk about comments to the posts were not the reason for suspension).
• 
  

An
ordered list of problems/issues involved

• 1. New functionality, that prevents suspended user from posting, has to be developed or enabled.

An
organized list, or a few short paragraphs detailing suggestions for
implementation

• 1. No new development is required to keep the content of suspended livejournal accesible.
• 
  2. New functionality, that prevents suspended user from posting, has to be developed or enabled.

Regards,
LiveJournal.com Team

http://www.livejournal.com/