Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет bioRxiv Subject Collection: Neuroscience ([info]syn_bx_neuro)
@ 2024-07-30 16:48:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Learning and modality independent time cells tile stimulus and post-stimulus period.
Hippocampal cells represent multiple dimensions of stimulus and behavioural context. Time-cells encode the dimension of time between events, but it is unclear if their properties depend on the behavioural paradigm. We find that in the sub-second time-scales of trace eyeblink conditioning (TEC), time cells occur both in stimulus and post-stimulus periods, and are insensitive both to modality and to state of learning. This contrasts with time-cell stimulus-dependence in delay non-match to sample (DNMS) tasks (~10 seconds). We observe 87% turnover of time-cells on successive days, but those time-cells which persist retain selectivity to stimulus and post-stimulus periods respectively. Finally, we show that 60% of time-encoding cells are active after the stimulus period, potentially providing an event trace for the network to link to later stimuli. Overall, TEC time-cells have distinct properties during turnover and are independent from behavioural state and contingency compared to DNMS.


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)