|
|
Пишет LWN.net (![[info]](http://lj.rossia.org/img/syndicated.gif){kind=small} syn_lwnheadline)@ 2012-12-31 21:11:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
The H Year: 2012's Wins, Fails and Mehs
The H rates
some highlights of 2012. "Win – The Linux community’s reboots Secure Boot – Microsoft’s requirement that OEMs start using UEFI’s Secure Boot function had caused much concern within the Linux community, but when that had died down, developers at Red Hat, SUSE, Canonical and the Linux Foundation worked on a range of solutions for Linux distributions, large and small, to use if they wanted to boot on a machine with Secure Boot enabled and a user not capable of disabling it. Good ideas and information was exchanged, code was written and answers were found; that's how things should work."
The H rates
some highlights of 2012. "Win – The Linux community’s reboots Secure Boot – Microsoft’s requirement that OEMs start using UEFI’s Secure Boot function had caused much concern within the Linux community, but when that had died down, developers at Red Hat, SUSE, Canonical and the Linux Foundation worked on a range of solutions for Linux distributions, large and small, to use if they wanted to boot on a machine with Secure Boot enabled and a user not capable of disabling it. Good ideas and information was exchanged, code was written and answers were found; that's how things should work."
